Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ml/nj
If it cut's spending, why do they have to raise the debt limit?

It doesn't cut spending at all. It merely cuts the rate at which spending would normally increase. Not the same thing. And without actual cuts, a "balanced budget" amendment is dangerous: it would simply allow government to raise taxes to any level necessary to match its spending increases.

I sent a number of emails to Boehner via his Website exhorting him to stay the course with the Tea Party goals. I guess I shouldn't be surprised that he caved.

107 posted on 08/02/2011 2:34:17 AM PDT by GoodDay (Palin for POTUS 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: GoodDay

The US is “planning” to dig its grave at a somewhat slower pace, but make no mistake - it is still digging that grave at the rate of over $1 trillion in new debt each year. If nothing changes, the total federal debt will far exceed $20 trillion by the end of this debt deal farce. Increasing the federal debt from $14 to $24 trillion over the next 10 years, instead of to $26 trillion, is madness. And even that timid goal will depend on wildly optimistic growth projections and a drop in unemployment.

Contrast this with Canada, where our current federal debt is only $564 Billion (the equivalent of $5.64 trillion US, on a per capita adjustment), with a balanced budget predicted in three years. And this from a Canadian government which also engaged in a foolish stimulus program.


109 posted on 08/02/2011 6:01:52 AM PDT by littleharbour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson