Posted on 08/02/2011 6:34:24 PM PDT by hercuroc
At any rate I did tell that impostor that she should drop her handle if she was now endorsing Perry.
Food for thought....... What are you going to tell Palin if she endorse Perry on Sep 3, in Iowa. It’s possible that she would if she decides not to get in and Perry is in. We’ll see how this all plays out over the next six weeks.
She was ticked off and all fired up. She blasted Romney.But she also only complimented Bachmann very favorably of how Bachmann is speaking up about the debt ceiling. Palin said, she is still on the fence of any Presidential announcement. I respect how she said she does not know if she is needed to comment/speak or run. She does not know; so this should be respected. IMO it looks like our country needs a third party the GOP is a dog and pony show of liars and democrats. This is a very serious decision for Palin as she would most likely have to go rogue with no big GOP tent. I do trust Bachmann would clean things up but the GOP and media will stop her. She is the only hope in the GOP line of people running. It is so bad Ron Paul is looking good; flame me all you want but who else is there?
Bachmann/Palin I trust these two don’t you?
Rubio is eligible. That is nonsense. Only thing I don’t like about Rubio is he did not welcome the tea party caucus when he first for to DC by joining;he went with the in moderate cool GOP crowd.Unless he joined since... I don’t know.
:-)
I didn't think it made her look bad at all. One thing for sure, I don't think I've ever seen a bad picture of her, a great advantage in a telegenic age.
Her interview was pretty darn good, which is even better.
I think we'll know on September 3!!!
She gave only kudos to Bachmann. It sounded like as of now she supports Bachmann but does not have a clue what she is doing and or is waiting for Perry to endorse.
She gave kudos only for her vote. Period.
Did I hear her correctly in this interview state legal reasons regarding her announcing or not? I seriously am not sure I heard it correctly.
bump
That is correct. There are legal considerations that are in part driving the timing of her decision announcement.
Well, she didn’t call Bachmann names like all of the fools on this forum have. It could have meant she is awaiting Perry or her self.She would not endorse any one now.
What legal considerations?
Who gives a crap what her hair looks like.Seriously! This is not Joan Rivers. It looked fine.
Last (we think) ethics complaint dismissed yesterday.
Documentary still in theaters (Isn't the expression "In kind contribution?")
Maybe something in her Fox contract.
Perhaps there are others...
typo check on aisle 7 clean up re post below
Rubio is eligible. That is nonsense. Only thing I don’t like about Rubio is he did not welcome the tea party caucus when he first got to DC; by joining.He seemed to go with the in moderate cool GOP crowd. (which nowadays is all but the tea party freshmen it seems)Unless he joined since... I don’t know.
Makes no sense but what do I know? The movie is in PPV soon and the media used a whole day all day the other day to gleefully report it as a flop. Fox gave Huck no probs...Maybe the trademarking her name? Who knows?
If that was to happen (God forbid) what could I say? I would be deeply disappointed/devastated, but it aint happening!
This is going to sound funny coming from a guy that calls himself Friendofgeorge as in GW Bush, but Perry would be like GW all over again, really not that much difference from the 2.
I respected GW a lot, he did some very good things, his appointments to the Supreme Court etc. Has been reported that he has said negative things about Sarah, he denies it, so he has benefit of the doubt at the moment, but we will see who he endorses in 2012 etc...I may have to change my handle yet.
To me it would be like all the Tea Parties work was for nothing, nominating a guy that worked for Al Gore.
Wait until he explains his time line to Christianity, that ought to be interesting, certainly he was not a Christian when he worked for Gore, when did this take place?
I have not said anything negative about Perry yet, other than he is not the person we need for this time,am sure he is a good man though, he has not hired Ed Rollins or anything unspeakable like Bachmann has done.
It may be without Palin in the race that he may be the best available, that would be very sad indeed.
But it aint happening, Sarah is running, I think she announces on Sept 3rd.
A Perry Presidency would be a giant step down from a Palin Presidency, and it would really just be same old same old. My passion would certainly be gone.
SARAH PALIN OR BUST!!!
If that was to happen (God forbid) what could I say? I would be deeply disappointed/devastated, but it aint happening!
This is going to sound funny coming from a guy that calls himself Friendofgeorge as in GW Bush, but Perry would be like GW all over again, really not that much difference from the 2.
I respected GW a lot, he did some very good things, his appointments to the Supreme Court etc. Has been reported that he has said negative things about Sarah, he denies it, so he has benefit of the doubt at the moment, but we will see who he endorses in 2012 etc...I may have to change my handle yet.
To me it would be like all the Tea Parties work was for nothing, nominating a guy that worked for Al Gore.
Wait until he explains his time line to Christianity, that ought to be interesting, certainly he was not a Christian when he worked for Gore, when did this take place?
I have not said anything negative about Perry yet, other than he is not the person we need for this time,am sure he is a good man though, he has not hired Ed Rollins or anything unspeakable like Bachmann has done.
It may be without Palin in the race that he may be the best available, that would be very sad indeed.
But it aint happening, Sarah is running, I think she announces on Sept 3rd.
A Perry Presidency would be a giant step down from a Palin Presidency, and it would really just be same old same old. My passion would certainly be gone.
SARAH PALIN OR BUST!!!
Patience Grasshopper. What is the rush? Nothing happens until the winter. Why give the media more time to attack and divide?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.