What Boortz suggests in cuts is a drop in the bucket.
This is a fight for America! Vote in 2012. Support the TEA Party! Vote for a Conservative. Not a 3rd party, but a Conservative!
Limited Government
Lower Taxes
Less Regulation
STOP THE SPENDING!
http://www.presentationexpert.com/stw/?p=qkrxv3ad32c4112ovvhi
This needs to be thought through a little more.
In effect, EVERY budget is a "balanced budget". In the sense that the brainiacs in State Capitals spend the money first and then propose tax increases to pay for the spending.
It should be the other way around. They should only be allowed to spend what they take in.
THAT would be a true balanced budget. As long as they are able to spend first, ask questions about how to pay for it later, we will get the same-ol', same-ol'.
Only now we will be providing them cover.
BUMP
Even with ozero gone and a new AG and others ... thousands of enemies are ensconced into the fabric of American socio/political functions.
Like ring-around-the-collar, you try soaking them out and scrubbing them out and there is still that ring-around-the-collar.
Its true. It would be easy to turn the economy and only require simple, common sense steps. The problem is that the Republicrat/Dumbocan Party doesn't want to turn the economy around. For them everything is going according to plan.
15. Issue permits to drill for oil in ANWR.
16. Accelerate all oil and gas drilling permits.
17. Expanding on 12: based on inputs from Business, permanently waive EPA and other rules and regulations that aret killing the job market.
18. Eliminate all Minimum Wage laws.
19. Set unemployment benefits to a maximum of 6 months.
20. Make the Bush tax cuts permanent.
21. Eliminate the Estate Tax.
I totally missed this story. The the heck is that about?
.Warren Harding figured it out in 1920...
Congress and the Executive Branch have lots to do.
So far they’re not doin’ it right..
Its been done before..
Harding cut the government’s budget nearly in half between 1920 and 1922. The rest of Harding’s approach was equally laissez-faire. Tax rates were slashed for all income groups. The national debt was reduced by one-third. The Federal Reserve’s activity, moreover, was hardly noticeable. As one economic historian puts it, “Despite the severity of the contraction, the Fed did not move to use its powers to turn the money supply around and fight the contraction.” 2 By the late summer of 1921, signs of recovery were already visible. The following year, unemployment was back down to 6.7 percent and was only 2.4 percent by 1923.
http://www.firstprinciplesjournal.com/articles.aspx?article=1319&loc=r
BTW..ole Warren ALSO fixed immigration...
Mr. Harding signed into law the Emergency Quota Act[3] which sought to control immigration following World War I and preserve the distinctive American culture by ensuring the majority of immigrants came from the historically compatible cultures of Northern Europe. This law aimed to bring wages of hard working Americans under control by limiting immigration to 3% of the 1910 census. It was followed on by a similar act in 1924, after Mr. Harding’s death.[4]
A Warren Harding prescription...if filled ...would ignite the afterburners on the US job machine and the economy. However DC would have to yield on a tremendous amount of power. Our job as We the People...is to persuade them of the “utlitity” ..shall we say..of doing so.
Simply freeze all regular expenditure at current levels, eliminate all specials such as TARP, and impose a zero hiring policy, to take effect immediately. Then conduct a PR campaign that the budget has absolutely no cuts which should settle the Dems' hash. Then work on actually reducing the levels by 10% yearly, to start next year.
Won’t happen under Obama. He is sinking in the sea and is chained to a rock of his own ideology.
Al Jolson used to say,
“You aint see nithin yet”.
“You aint see nothing yet”.
Arrogantly simplistic when you omit the implementation plan.