Posted on 08/14/2011 5:41:42 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA
That’s it ,your reply?? Dude I feel sorry for you the ACU is a good source of records on reps that have been in office a year or more,Try it and learn something!
Perhaps I’ll try talking with you some other time when your lacy panties aren’t quite so twisted up.
Or maybe not.
“But to a little man...
My wife can confirm the opposite is true.
Troll Did you vote for Mr West???
My handle and tag line should be able to tell someone of even your intelligence that I did not.
I do apologize for thinking that you were drunk on Jack Daniels. After digesting some more of your posts, I think that you are clearly on something a lot lower shelf than JD.”
No wee one, I do not drink,but can clearly see you do, to the extremes,BUT clear the fog for a minute ,what is your excuse for the stupidity? and being without a single fact here,I can see now it is alcohol!
I am sorry to hear about your friend. A boy down the street from me joined the Marines about two years ago and is in Afghanistan. Not a day goes by without me thinking of him, and I get angry as hell when returning vets tell me about the ridiculous rules of engagement they have to follow.
We should always be asking questions of our political leadership. For instance, when we know we can not trust them to live by a budget deal and make future cuts, why would we ever trust these same politicians with our most precious treasure, which is our children? Yet, these same elitist politicians cry wolf about a foreign danger and so many of us automatically throw our support behind them. Liars are liars, and if you can't trust them on a simple budget deal why would you trust them on something as final and deadly as warfare? We must always ask questions.
“Perhaps Ill try talking with you some other time when your lacy panties arent quite so twisted up.
Or maybe not.”
Damn That’s it?????????LOL LOL LOL LOL
That's the scoundrel alright.
I agree with you that West’s votes stink, and IMO, no matter how he justifies them, the point is that he is voting in opposition to the will of the people in his district.
I’m sorry that he’s not 100% pro life. And you’re right, it’s the votes on the House floor that count.
And voting no on repealing Obamacare because other issues are more pressing? I’m astounded at that one! Did he try to speak before the Rules Committee, or talk things over with Boehner, which would have been the appropriate ways to deal with these concerns? A no vote doesn’t register an opinion that the bill shouldn’t have been presented on the floor.
I don’t see West as being a conservative.
“I agree with you that Wests votes stink, and IMO, no matter how he justifies them, the point is that he is voting in opposition to the will of the people in his district.
Im sorry that hes not 100% pro life. And youre right, its the votes on the House floor that count.
And voting no on repealing Obamacare because other issues are more pressing? Im astounded at that one! Did he try to speak before the Rules Committee, or talk things over with Boehner, which would have been the appropriate ways to deal with these concerns? A no vote doesnt register an opinion that the bill shouldnt have been presented on the floor.
I dont see West as being a conservative.”
Yes I was very disappointed,The Tea party is handling it now and tomorrow will find out more,LOL BTW I like your nick name,Best Regards.
You are right that the politicians are spineless cowards, and once they realize that people are on to them then they will look for new methods to try and keep us in our place.
“I sympathize with your disappointment. I used to be a Laura Ingraham fan until I saw her undeniable Beltway establishmentarianism via the West situation. Please ping me when you post the info - I want to keep on top of this story.”
I will hear more tomorrow,I have breakfast with a couple of them here in Fort Leftydale. Take care,it is all for the cause.
I didn’t know he did.
I haven’t followed him, really. I just noticed this and admired him for it.
“I didnt know he did.
I havent followed him, really. I just noticed this and admired him for it.”
Voting records are just that,and this will make or break us!
To someone like you - yes.
Quite apropos, actually.
“Thats it ,your reply??
To someone like you - yes.
Quite apropos, actually.”
No answers Yet!! Let me guess, you are a Troll Nobody in life!
And after all your posts and name calling of people on this thread, one might think your are an
You have a nice night - bye now - and always.
Thanks for the belly laugh.. You’re killing me.. Hahahaha!
Now that there is funny. LOL.
Iirc, that is a drag queen. Not the person being discussed.
One point about letting Iran get their nuke, if they have one and we turn their labs into glass and eliminate their military from the face of the earth, we'd be justified. If they don't have one, it's a lot like shooting the unarmed.
Now you may return to the regularly scheduled character assasination and feces flinging this thread has become.
Aas a pure mental exercise I can appreciate Ron Paul's "devil's argument" for some other country wanting a nuclear weapon but this is I-R-A-N. It's not Sweden. Iran is not the Soviet Union just as Col West pointed at when he referred to the old "mutually assured destruction" Cold War policy.
Paulbots, of course, smear West as part of the globalist military industrial complex.
Ron Paul is too isolationist for practical purposes. Already taking the DOD down to 3% of GDP where Clinton had it, Democrats want to dismantle the U.S. military for a grand social state that won't exist if our enemies are left unchecked and, let's not kid ourselves, our "allies" have already gutted and dismantled their militaries in favor of giant (failing) social states because they know the U.S. is on the job.
Since Obama wanted to keep plausible deniability regarding the War Powers act and starting his own war, the Libyan kinetic military action meant NATO had to depend on France's single carrier which had to return to port quickly for maintenance.
The Brits are down from three carriers to one and it's on the verge of retirement with no Harriers to fly from it since they've all gone to scrap. There's a period of about six years where the Brits will have NO carrier at all to deploy and when the new one is launched, their F-35s won't even be ready to fly from it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.