Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O4P-CA: Could CA Blues Make Reagan Country Red?
us4palin.com ^ | Sunday, August 21, 2011 | Thomas Schmitz

Posted on 08/21/2011 8:28:27 AM PDT by GonzoII

O4P-CA: Could CA Blues Make Reagan Country Red?

by Thomas Schmitz on Sunday, August 21, 2011 03:57 EDT


We have all been told that California is a blue state, a Democrat stronghold, and its 55 Electoral College votes will inevitably be awarded to President Barack Obama in 2012. Therefore, the conventional wisdom goes that we, as conservatives, should not bother putting up a fight for it. Yet, there are conservatives who recognize that California has all the pieces of the puzzle to be a great and prosperous state, and that it is time for Californians to not only put California back on the track to prosperity but also America. In March 2011, the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) released a survey that documented that there are cracks in the inevitability of California continuing to support President Obama. This was further supported by PPIC’s July polling of likely voters in California. These cracks create opportunities for conservatives to lay the ground work necessary to make California competitive in the 2012 Presidential Election and, possibly, even to make it red again!

In the March 2011 survey PPIC reported Californians’ opinions of their government. The organization found that 52% of those surveyed had an unfavorable opinion of the federal government and 55% had an unfavorable opinion of state government. (Note, the state number is lower than what was reported in the fall of 2010.) PPIC also found that while 52% of likely voters in California approved of President Obama’s job performance, 64% felt that President Obama was not doing enough to help create jobs. When PPIC examined all adults, the number increased to 68%. Furthermore, in March 2011, 63% of Californians felt that the federal deficit was a serious problem facing the country. Since the release of this data, President Obama’s job approval has eroded among likely voters in California. PPIC polled likely voters from July 5, 2011 to July 19, 2011 and found that only 48% of likely voters in California approved of President Obama’s job performance.

These outcomes do not appear to be outliers and they seem to be reflective of what is occurring in other blue states and Democrat strongholds, such as New York and New Jersey. On August 16, 2011, the Siena Research Institute reported that only 36% of New Yorkers approved of President Obama’s job performance as president, which was a decrease of 17 points over a three month period. The very next day, Quinnipac reported that 52% of New Jersey voters disapproved of President Obama’s job performance, which was a dramatic change from the 50% job approval he enjoyed just two months earlier.

Several things could explain the drop in approval ratings: the rising and continued high unemployment in the United States; the recent battle in Washington, D.C. over the raising of the nation’s debt ceiling; the downgrade of the United States’ credit rating by S&P; and the rollercoaster sell-offs that have occurred on Wall Street over the summer seeing hardworking Americans again experiencing dramatic losses in their investments and retirement plans. Additionally, millions of Americans continue to every day feel the impact of the economic and fiscal crisis that has gripped the United States since the fall of 2008, and those who were once supportive of President Obama are now beginning to question his leadership on these important issues, particularly whether he is the right person to lead this country. As such, we are now starting to see that President Obama’s support is bleeding in California, similar to that in New Jersey and New York. This is most likely why the Obama administration announced recently that it would release a new jobs plan in September. The Democrats know without “blue states” like New Jersey, New York and California they cannot hold the White House in 2012, and most likely will be facing monumental losses in down ballot Congressional races.

However, if changing opinions of the populous were all it took to win elections in California, then our work would be relatively easier than the hard slog we know it to be. All elections, particularly those in California, are won by the party or candidate who has the best ground game. We know the Democrat Party, the unions, and the community organizing groups for the Democrat Party have a strong machine in place and know what it takes to get the job done. We also know that most political experts believe that the majority of Californians will vote Democrat. Part of this thinking is based upon the fact that in 2008 the Democrat Party had an approximate 2 million voter registration margin over Republicans. The numbers have not changed considerably since that time. Additionally, it is also based upon the unfortunate fact that rather than gaining registered voters, the California Republican Party has been losing registered voters for years; whether by natural attrition (i.e. more Republicans are dying or moving out of state) or by deliberately leaving the Republican Party. The California Secretary of State reported in February 2011 the percentage of registered Republicans decreased from 35.2% to 30.9% over a seven year period. During this same period of time, Independents (i.e. Declined to States) were the fastest growing “political” group in California, increasing by 5 percentage points from 15.3% to 20.4% of registered voters. Democrats marginally lost voters, decreasing from 44.4% to 44%.

While Democrats are the plurality of registered voters in California, conservativism is on the rise. According to a series of PPIC surveys of political party affiliations released in September 2010, 73% of registered Republicans indicated that they are politically conservative, which was up 8 points from 2006. PPIC also found that from 2006 to 2010 while Independent/Declined to State voters tended to lean towards the Democrat Party, this party affiliation was down 4 points, and those who reported that they were liberal declined by 3 points to 29%. The organization found that 31% of Independent/Declined to State voters identified as being politically conservative, up 5 points since 2006. Additionally, within the Democrat Party 18% of voters identified as being politically conservative. When PPIC examined likely voters in California, it found they were more likely to be conservative (40%), as opposed to being liberal (31%) or middle of the road (29%). Even those adults who are eligible to vote but are not registered were more likely to be conservative (36%) compared to being liberal (33%) or middle of the road (31%).

What we learn from looking at these political affiliations and identifications is that there is a large swath of California voters who are receptive to the conservative message because they identify as being politically conservative. Additionally, the numbers reflecting Californians’ opinions of President Obama’s handling of America’s economic issues show that the majority of likely voters in California may be receptive to voting for someone other than President Obama in the 2012 Presidential election, especially if his administration does not reverse course and our nation’s economic outlook does not vastly improve in the next 12 months.

With this in mind, we must remember that 2012 will be a high-turn out election. As such, it will not be enough for conservative activists to only get Republicans to the polls. This is supported by PPIC which concluded that because neither major party has a majority of registered voters Independents hold an important influence over the outcome of an election. In 2006, the Independents broke for Arnold Schwarzenegger; in 2008, the Independents broke for Barack Obama. In order to make California competitive, conservatives must not only target the Republican Party, which is absolutely critical for get-out-the-vote efforts, but they must also target Independents, particularly those who have pulled Republican ballots in the past. It is imperative that conservatives start now laying the ground work for get-out-the-vote efforts for 2012, which means talking to neighbors, friends, and family members; getting connected with local Tea Party and conservative groups; or volunteering to walk precincts or hold neighborhood tea parties in order to connect with people in the community. During all this hard work, we must remember that California is a beautiful state and it is worth the actions we take now to begin righting it. For an over taxed, over regulated state like our once golden California 2012 cannot come soon enough.

Citizen Rebecca

Rebecca is the Los Angeles City and County Coordinator of Organize4Palin. She has been doing political analyses for several organizations in the Los Angeles area, including TEAPAC. This article is part of a series of articles she’s writing for TEAPAC.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: palin; palin2012; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last


MANY MORE STICKER DESIGNS HERE

1 posted on 08/21/2011 8:28:32 AM PDT by GonzoII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

California has been dominated by Democrats at the federal, state, and local levels..like an addict, the state first has to hit absolute rock bottom before it can begin to recover. That they elected Moonbean shows that they’re still in denial.


2 posted on 08/21/2011 8:34:08 AM PDT by ken5050 (Should Christie RUN in 2012? NO!!! But he should WALK 3 miles every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
It's gonna take a lot to change Kaleephornya.

To quote Mike Ratley of West Side Ford, in Firebaugh, CA,

"Those of us who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living."

3 posted on 08/21/2011 8:34:42 AM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
Palin has a bigger set than Zero. Photobucket
4 posted on 08/21/2011 8:39:20 AM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

We can thank Pete Wilson for beginning the process and George W. Bush for the final destruction of the California Republican Party. It will take a grass-roots revolt to fix it, yet the small business/landowner base is so busy just surviving all the regulations with which they have been saddled they don’t have the time or money to depose the entrenched “country club” interests who have been feeding off the system for decades.


5 posted on 08/21/2011 8:40:04 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
Do I recall correctly that California passed legislation that awards its EV's to the highest Presidential vote getter nationally regardless of which way voters in their own state voted for President?

If so, Republicans shouldn't waste a dime on the national campaign in CA and concentrate only on House and Senate races. CA is either lost to the (D)'s as we have come to expect or it is a win by default if we win elsewhere.

No downside and no money wasted.

FReegards!


6 posted on 08/21/2011 8:40:10 AM PDT by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

I thought that California just passed a law saying the winner of the national popular vote will recieve it’s 55 Electoral College votes.
So CA might be voting RED whether they like it or not.
Maybe i’m wrong...


7 posted on 08/21/2011 8:43:45 AM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Not a chance in hell. California is a lost cause.


8 posted on 08/21/2011 8:44:25 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

California going Republican? I am going to file this in the pipe dream file with the threads headlining blacks and Jewish people are going Republican.


9 posted on 08/21/2011 8:45:24 AM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Agamemnon

I think the stupid rule of sending votes to the majority winner takes effect only if enough other states pass the same stupid law. Good thing California can find new ways to keep lawyers busy.


10 posted on 08/21/2011 8:50:15 AM PDT by Bernard (When the only Problem is overspending, all the Solutions look like TAX INCREASES to liberals...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

California is not and never will be a Battleground state. It will forever be a Plowed Under state buried in tons of Democrat doo doo.


11 posted on 08/21/2011 8:50:57 AM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chuckee

Yep, they like the socialist system. Face it, a lot of the state is Mexican imports. The big cities are loaded with them.

Carley tried it, Meg Whitman tried it to no avail.

People should drop the delusions. Things have changed since Reagan, and to top that off there isn’t a Reagan anywhere in or out of this race.

Best for anyone on our side to spend funds on states where there might be a chance.


12 posted on 08/21/2011 8:58:06 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Agamemnon
Do I recall correctly that California passed legislation that awards its EV's to the highest Presidential vote getter nationally regardless of which way voters in their own state voted for President?

That's all the rage among the fascist collectivist-controlled states, but they generally enact it with a provision that it only goes into effect when states with electoral votes totaling 270 or more pass the same legislation. That way they don't lose their influence until they can drag the entire nation down into the collectivist commie sewage along with them.

13 posted on 08/21/2011 9:09:48 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Unless Kali can find a way to get tens of million of Mexicans to vote for a Republican, nope, not going to happen.


14 posted on 08/21/2011 9:13:09 AM PDT by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckee

The Democrat DUng is sooooo deeeeeep heeeere it has drowned in the cesspool of excrement. Cleaning the political bowl will take way more toilet cleaner than you think....


15 posted on 08/21/2011 9:13:47 AM PDT by Republic Rocker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: chuckee

It will forever be a Plowed Under state buried in tons of Democrat doo doo.”

lol! Nice coin of phrase there: Plowed Under State! Love it!


16 posted on 08/21/2011 9:14:32 AM PDT by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mowowie
I thought that California just passed a law saying the winner of the national popular vote will recieve it’s 55 Electoral College votes. So CA might be voting RED whether they like it or not.

Plus...I'm sure if the rule caused them to send (R) electors, the rule would get challenged in court till the end of time. Rules like that are only inviolate when they benefit leftist collectivists.

Like in 2000, the Dems knew it would be close and envisioned the same scenario that happened but in reverse -- a electoral/popular split with Gore winning the electoral, and they were running around reminding everyone that it was the electoral results that counted. Then as soon as the results came in, all the Democrat scum started decrying the present system (because they lost).

Or like when the Dems were in the minority on both houses of Congress and you hear nothing in the media except stuff about how the voice of the minority must be taken into account (except you have to take it so much into account that they're actually in control), then when they win the majority, it's a mandate and "we won!"

17 posted on 08/21/2011 9:16:32 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Interesting that conservatives, 40 percent, outnumber liberal, 30 percent, and many independents, 29 percent, may lean conservative. Could we be seeing 1984 all over again?


18 posted on 08/21/2011 9:27:32 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

The California voters keep voting the same people in over and over yet they expect change. Seems to me there is a name for people who keep doing the same thing over and over again but expect a different outcome.


19 posted on 08/21/2011 9:54:09 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

I wish the authors of the article and the polling outfit gave an honest admission that must be understood about each and every one of the numbers for “disapprove” of Obama’s performance on any number of policy issues.

Among most Marxists, Progressives and Liberals who join those that check “disapprove” in the poll, THEIR disapproval is centered on their belief that Obama has not promoted THEIR KIND of policy prescriptions aggressively enough. Their disapproval is NOT that they wish Obama listened more to Conservatives and the GOP.

That “disapproval” from THEM may not translate into greater (than the past) approval, by them, for any GOP candidate.

At most it may increase their “voter apathy” come November 2012.

At best the numbers may mean some Left leaning “independents” could abandon the Dem agenda in November 2012.

Unless large numbers of “never voted before” and “independent” types become ACTIVE in wanting “change” in November 2012, I do not see Obama’s “disapproval” ratings translating to greater Conservative possibilities beyond the race for POTUS.

We have seen so often in the past how Liberal Democrat legislative office candidates - State and Federal - can track to the right in an election campaign, going “with the grain” in distancing themselves from a waning Dim POTUS contender, or tracking right on some “local” issue - holding onto their seats and blunting/stifling a Conservative change of the Executive branch.

I think the Conservative possibilities are something less than the authors are promoting.


20 posted on 08/21/2011 10:29:19 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson