Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-baby boom: Why U.S. birth rate keeps falling
CNN ^ | August 16, 2011 | Jessica Dickler

Posted on 08/28/2011 2:32:58 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Right before the recession hit, the U.S. was undergoing a mini baby boom. Now, birth rates are declining fast.

The number of children born in the U.S. peaked with a record 4.3 million births in 2007, but has since fallen, dropping to 4 million births last year, according to estimates by the National Center for Health Statistics. The birth rate -- a measure of births per 1,000 people -- has dropped 10%.

Historically, declines in birth rates have gone hand in hand with economic downturns. During the financial slumps of the early 1990's and 1970's, the birth rates fell 15% and 18%, respectively. In the midst of the Great Depression, the birth rate was down by 17%.

Meanwhile, the cost of raising a child has risen steadily since the U.S. Department of Agriculture began tracking the data in 1960. From buying car seats and strollers to paying for childcare and schooling, a middle-income family could spend an average of $226,920 to raise a child born in 2010 to age 18 (and that doesn't include overwhelming cost of college), according to the USDA.

The escalating cost, coupled with the most recent economic downturn, has caused many women to postpone or even forgo their plans to have children, said Steven Martin, a senior research associate for the Institute of Human Development and Social Change at New York University. "Certainly economic calamity does cause a significant decline in fertility," he said.

In fact, nearly half, or 43%, of women said they would wait to start or expand their family until they felt financially stable, according to a recent survey by BabyCenter.com, an online parenting resource.

(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthrate; contraception; demographics; populationcontrol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: MinorityRepublican
Actually, what I get out of this is that the numbers of children spike after major wars and decline during long periods of peace. I think it's pretty obvious why this is.

That said, the main reason why people decide to have a lot of kids is that they come to realize that life is beautiful, worth living, and an amazing gift of God.
41 posted on 08/28/2011 4:37:14 PM PDT by Antoninus (Nothing that offends God can possibly be a legitimate right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bwc2221

The largest family in our local homeschooling group has 13 children, but they could have more. She’s only a couple of years older than I am.

We have only one table, and the 2-year-old in the booster seat with tray. With only 8 children at home now (oldest is in the Coast Guard) it’s crowded but workable, if people keep their elbows in and their feet to themselves.


42 posted on 08/28/2011 4:44:27 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("True education is not an adjustment to the world, but a defense against the world.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Any tax payer that has only two kids in their household is paying for three more that they dont even know the name of.We cant afford any more.


43 posted on 08/28/2011 4:45:08 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulwyf

Ah, three was the hardest ... or maybe it was just *my* third one ;-).


44 posted on 08/28/2011 4:45:25 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("True education is not an adjustment to the world, but a defense against the world.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
I think it's pretty obvious why this is.

Could you explain, briefly? The zombies got my brains.

***

Vegetarian zombie: GRAAAAAAINS!
Plumber zombie: DRAAAAAAAINS!
Dentist zombie: PAAAAAAINS!

45 posted on 08/28/2011 4:52:39 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("True education is not an adjustment to the world, but a defense against the world.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

quote “From buying car seats and strollers to paying for childcare and schooling, a middle-income family could spend an average of $226,920 to raise a child born in 2010 “

lol

what a total lie.

why do they lie about this? they have been pushing this lie my whole life. I have four kids FOUR and they cost me so little I hardly even know they are there.

I may spend an extra grand or two total per year for all of them combined. So, they are only off by about $800,000 or so in their estimate of what it costs to have kids.

Between hand-me-downs and gifts for birthdays and christmas, I hardly ever have to buy them anything but a little extra food and some school clothes every now and then.


46 posted on 08/28/2011 5:04:53 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
(...expecting my 10th child early next year.)

Ooooh! Congratulations!!

47 posted on 08/28/2011 5:06:37 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (To ACLU & its plaintiffs: Stop dragging the public into your personal struggle w/ God. -Mark Baisley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

The key is that a family “could” spend all that money. They’re probably assuming the family buys a more expensive house each time they have a child, and that they all go to daycare from 6 weeks and then to private school.

As to what the family “must” spend ... well, they have to eat.


48 posted on 08/28/2011 5:09:15 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("True education is not an adjustment to the world, but a defense against the world.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

Thank you. I’m seeing the specialist (”por las mujeres viejas,” the old women, I was just telling the church ladies) on Tuesday to have the in-depth ultrasound, and then I’ll tell my family. Right now only my husband, some FReepers, and an array of Spanish-speaking women know. The office ultrasound looked okay - size is right for the dates, and it has all its limbs.


49 posted on 08/28/2011 5:13:03 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("True education is not an adjustment to the world, but a defense against the world.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
45 years old, expecting my 10th child early next year.

Outstanding! You've obviously done more than your share of bringing new Americans into this world. I managed to produce six, myself. Well, with the help of their momma, of course ;-)

50 posted on 08/28/2011 5:14:43 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
You've obviously done more than your share of bringing new Americans into this world.

So have you. I'm fortunate in having children easily, as well as general good health; you can't do more than your stamina allows.

51 posted on 08/28/2011 5:25:50 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("True education is not an adjustment to the world, but a defense against the world.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

20 to 25 seems to be a good number.
I’m going to have to talk with my kids.

***
You really think you can convince your kids to give you that many grandchildren?


52 posted on 08/28/2011 5:41:29 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Palin in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Home schoolers


53 posted on 08/28/2011 5:47:32 PM PDT by esquirette ("Our hearts are restless until they find rest in Thee." ~ Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: aNYCguy

The point is that whites are soon to be a minority in this country. The point is also that a large majority of abortions since 1973 have been by white females.

If you think the country after that will ever look the same, you are wrong, which is why you need to study what happened in Europe. Read “The Cube and the Cathedral.”

You debunked nothing, by the way, just spouted some slanted stats that do not give the complete picture, and we know the saying about stats.

Next time, just provide some information to the other freeper rather than just saying, “Hey, that sounds like a stupid comment. Does everyone here agree with me?”


54 posted on 08/28/2011 5:48:09 PM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
I'm fortunate in having children easily, as well as general good health; you can't do more than your stamina allows.

You've got to be in the top percentile in all three categories. I can only imagine how many people marvel at what you've done.

55 posted on 08/28/2011 5:55:19 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Why? The war against men. The ridiculous sex crimes (watch the daily threads on FR.)


56 posted on 08/28/2011 5:58:05 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Congratulations!!! Blessings to your family!


57 posted on 08/28/2011 6:11:41 PM PDT by kiki04 ("If a little knowledge is dangerous, where is a man who has so much as to be out of danger?" - THH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Their boys can’t swim?


58 posted on 08/28/2011 6:19:30 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU


59 posted on 08/28/2011 6:35:18 PM PDT by Waywardson (Carry on! Nothing equals the splendor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
The point is that whites are soon to be a minority in this country etc.

I addressed a very specific claim that was flat-out, laughably wrong. That doesn't obligate me to care about what you think the greater point is. That doesn't obligate me to care about what you think happened to Europe, nor read your favorite books on the subject.

I don't think that correcting claims which are wildly factually incorrect should require any justification, or a declaration of any editorial slant. The fact that you think someone has to take a specific activist stance just to establish the facts is not a good indicator of intellectual honesty.

You debunked nothing, by the way, just spouted some slanted stats that do not give the complete picture, and we know the saying about stats.

Excellent. Another conspiracy theorist. I assume you have no conflicting data, right? Just a gut feeling, some anecdotes, and a very strong desire to be right about something or other?
60 posted on 08/28/2011 7:03:32 PM PDT by aNYCguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson