Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oceander
Isn't punctuated equilibrium the explanation that was concocted in order to explain the general lack of transitional fossils in the geological record?

Just asking, from a layman's perspective...

15 posted on 08/31/2011 8:37:07 PM PDT by sargon (I don't like the sound of these "boncentration bamps")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: sargon
...the general lack of transitional fossils in the geological record?

Every single specimen in the fossil record is a transitional fossil, including your bones and mine when we die.

22 posted on 08/31/2011 8:48:24 PM PDT by GunRunner (***Not associated with any criminal actions by the ATF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: sargon
It wasn't just "concocted" as a figleaf to cover up some supposed "error" in theory. The theory of punctuated equilibrium was actually developed by Stephen Jay Gould and Niles Eldredge to explain the exact opposite: the apparent monotony of the fossil record; that is, Eldredge and Gould set out to try and explain why the fossil record looked the way it does and why there wasn't apparent gradualism in the fossil record.

The explanation is, to summarize it (almost to the point of bowdlerizing it), that once a new species develops, it's form quickly stabilizes and thereafter most genetic changes result in slight genetic drifts and "wobbles" that nonetheless do not deviate too far from the original form of the species.

As to the (mis)use of punctuated equilibrium to "support" the myth of intelligent design or creationism, I think that Mr. Gould's words speak for themselves, and for him.
23 posted on 08/31/2011 8:50:24 PM PDT by Oceander (The phrase "good enough for government work" is not meant as a compliment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: sargon

Yep, you are correct.


60 posted on 08/31/2011 9:40:54 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: sargon

We REALLY do NOT ‘believe’ in evolution or we would NOT be trying so hard to avoid it!

Who gets to say that birth defects are ‘defects’?

Who gets to say that the things we die from now are bad? t’s merely the survival of the fittest.


151 posted on 09/01/2011 5:31:24 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson