Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jedidah
California border and Texas border are vastly different in terrain. What works one place is a costly boondoggle in another.

Duh. Now, take that observation and apply it in reverse: Does Perry advocate fencing in those locations where it would be of obvious tactical benefit?

No.

QED.

265 posted on 09/03/2011 3:49:59 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie

You ask: Does Perry advocate fencing in those locations where it would be of obvious tactical benefit?

You answer: No.

But that’s not what Perry suggests nor what he said today.

Here’s his direct quote:

“There are places along the border that strategic fencing worked, particularly in the metropolitan areas,” Perry said. “The idea that we’re going to build a wall from El Paso to Brownsville doesn’t make sense ‘cause the fact of the matter is you know, number one, you’d never get it built, and it’d cost billions of dollars ... by the time you go from Tijuana to Brownsville.” Perry said that he does support putting “boots on the ground” and using “aviation assets” (i.e. aerial drones) to secure the border.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0911/62583.html#ixzz1WvvQ3FqH

Duh.

Look, I don’t even like Perry, but he’s right on this. The suggestion that we should fence the entire Texas/Mexico border is just absurd.

I hate it when FR dumbs down like this.


285 posted on 09/03/2011 4:05:57 PM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson