Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AAABEST

It should not be replaced by a state-level program it should be replaced by individual retirement accounts.

State-level socialism is still socialism


4 posted on 09/07/2011 8:05:40 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GeronL
It should not be replaced by a state-level program it should be replaced by individual retirement accounts. State-level socialism is still socialism

Plus people move from state to state. State-level creates too many complications.

27 posted on 09/07/2011 8:25:12 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (When you've only heard lies your entire life, the truth sounds insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL

I am not much on forced savings myself, and being not nearly old enough to get SS before it collapses I am completely for personal accounts. As a compromise I think you could set up a govt sponsored retirement system that would avoid being overly coercive like it is now, as well as avoiding the SS ponzi scheme setup.

Every person in America would get one, either thru their bank or with the SSA like it is now. The govt style SS with paycheck withholdings would be the default or you could opt out to do your own thing, or even do both. You could also have other IRA’s but one would be permanent.

Another thing is that any retirement deferred plan with any entity couldn’t be loaned out and must be 100% funded and segregated.


38 posted on 09/07/2011 8:36:26 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL
It should not be replaced by a state-level program it should be replaced by individual retirement accounts.

Most people already have IRAs or 401Ks.

63 posted on 09/07/2011 9:19:44 AM PDT by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL
It should not be replaced by a state-level program it should be replaced by individual retirement accounts.

Easy to say for the young who doesn't have a very big investment in the current system. A state run system sounds a bit too risky for those of who have already paid into SS all their lives and are now expecting their measly SS retirement once we've retired.

If the current system remains fully funded until everyone who has paid into it fully finally dies off then I don't have a problem with another risky state run ponzi scheme to replace the current federal ponzi scheme we currently have.

78 posted on 09/07/2011 11:01:17 AM PDT by Ron H. (Loving my Deering Goodtime 2 Classic 5-stringer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL

You are absolutely correct.


80 posted on 09/07/2011 12:23:28 PM PDT by Maryhere ("HE comes to rule the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson