Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Left's Solyndra Damage Control
The Atlantic Wire ^ | John Hudson

Posted on 09/14/2011 1:27:51 PM PDT by dead

The latest batch of e-mails documenting the Obama administration's involvement in a $535 million federal loan to bankrupt solar company Solyndra has liberals scrambling to point fingers at an array of perceived villains. Whether fairly or not, Republicans are using the flawed investment to attack the whole lot of government-led green investments. Here's what Democrats are saying to push back:

Solyndra misled us
As Politico's Darren Samuelsohn notes, blaming the solar company has become a favored talking point on the Hill. "Democrats argue they were lulled into complacency by Solyndra executives who said all would be well once they restructured operations. They say they didn’t really start paying attention until this month’s FBI raid on the company and its late August bankruptcy protection filing." Daniel Weiss, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund, adds "The reality is no one outside the company had any idea they were in such dire straits.”

Bush approved of Solyndra too
Stephen Lacy at Climate Progress emphasizes that "the loan guarantee came together under both administrations" noting that "The Bush team tried to conditionally approve the Solyndra loan just before President Obama took office." In January 2009, Lacy notes that "in an effort to show it has done something to support renewable energy, the Bush Administration tries to take Solyndra before a DOE credit review committee before President Obama is inaugurated." Pushing back against the claim, Philip Klein at The Washington Examiner notes that a committee background memo stipulates that "a recommendation for approval" was "premature at this time.” Politico adds that "Democrats also noted that Schwarzenegger attended Solyndra’s groundbreaking."

We wouldn't be in this mess if we had passed cap and trade
Tom Friedman at The New York Times says "I wasn’t surprised to read that the solar panel company Solyndra, which got $535 million in loan guarantees from the Department of Energy to make solar panels in America, filed for bankruptcy protection two weeks ago and laid off 1,100 workers... There is only one effective, sustainable way to produce “green jobs,” and that is with a fixed, durable, long-term price signal that raises the price of dirty fuels and thereby creates sustained consumer demand for, and sustained private sector investment in, renewables."

It's China's fault
notes Stephen Lacy at Climate Progress: "Armed with tens of billions in loans from the Chinese government, Chinese solar companies have scaled at a rate unthinkable only a few years ago. At the end of this year, there will likely be 50,000 MW of manufacturing capacity in place around the world, with much of that new capacity being developed in China and other Asian countries. (In the year 2000, there was only 100 MW of production capacity world-wide.)" The Washington Post's Ezra Klein pushes back, slightly, against the idea, saying "it wasn’t China that caused Solyndra to go belly-up — the company had invented a solar panel that didn’t use silicon, unlike its competitors, and foundered after silicon prices plummeted."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bhocorruption; corruption; democratcorruption; democrats; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; liberalfascism; obama; solyndra; thegreenlie
Friedman's turd stands out as particularly stinky in a this outhouse of excuses.
1 posted on 09/14/2011 1:27:53 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dead

The latest is that this was started in Bush’s admin...

But OBAMA OWNS THIS 100%

He pushed it through and trumpeted it as HIS SUCCESS with this as part of HIS STIMULOUS BILL.

The are all OBAMA SUPPORTERS

WHERE DID THE MONEY GO?


2 posted on 09/14/2011 1:29:49 PM PDT by Mr. K (Palin/Bachman 2012- unbeatable ticket~!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
"We wouldn't be in this mess if we had passed cap and trade"

Ding~! Ding~! Ding~!

There is probably more truth to that then they would care to admit (..or be found out)

I bet they were all betting big bucks on Obama's promise of Cap and Trade. I bet they would have made a fortune. ~!!

3 posted on 09/14/2011 1:34:30 PM PDT by Mr. K (Palin/Bachman 2012- unbeatable ticket~!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

Yeah Friedman is a nincompoop. If ONLY gas were fixed at $10/gallon, then we’d be clamoring for solar power. Do these people really think this, or are they intentionally putting us on?


4 posted on 09/14/2011 1:37:00 PM PDT by boop ("Let's just say they'll be satisfied with LESS"... Ming the Merciless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Solyndra misled us As Politico’s Darren Samuelsohn notes,

Nobody mentions the fact that Price Waterhouse looked at this business plan prior to them opening the doors should not be ignored.


5 posted on 09/14/2011 1:39:02 PM PDT by Recon Dad ("Don't forget, incoming fire has the right of way..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dead; Fractal Trader; Genesis defender; 4horses+amule; Carlucci; Little Bill; Desdemona; Nipfan; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

6 posted on 09/14/2011 1:39:56 PM PDT by steelyourfaith (If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

Yes. Yes. Yes. But where, exactly, did the half-billion go?


7 posted on 09/14/2011 1:40:46 PM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Bush Administration Voted Against Solyndra Loan

"The results of the Congressional probe shared Tuesday with ABC News show that less than two weeks before President Bush left office, on January 9, 2009, the Energy Department's credit committee had voted against offering a loan commitment to Solyndra.

Even after Obama took office on Jan. 20, 2009, analysts in the Energy Department and in the Office of Management and Budget were repeatedly questioning the wisdom of the loan. In one exchange, an Energy official wrote of "a major outstanding issue" -- namely, that Solyndra's numbers showed it would run out of cash in September 2011..."


8 posted on 09/14/2011 1:41:12 PM PDT by EdReform (Oath Keepers - Guardians of the Republic - Honor your oath - Join us: www.oathkeepers.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
"It's people... you've got to tell them... Solyndra is people!"
9 posted on 09/14/2011 1:47:21 PM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

You can bet that after a few million for the building, a few Mil for exec bonuses (boni?) and a few mil for payroll and misc costs, MANY mil went under the table into RAT and union coffers as kickbacks.


10 posted on 09/14/2011 1:51:16 PM PDT by Zman516
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dead

Libs have always wished for high gas prices so that America would be forced to convert to “green” energy and ride subways to work every day. Well, gas prices are high, and there still is no justification for converting to “green” energy.


11 posted on 09/14/2011 1:52:40 PM PDT by lormand (A Government who robs Peter to pay Paul, will always have the support of Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
where, exactly, did the half-billion go

"Obama 2012"

12 posted on 09/14/2011 1:54:39 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lormand

The whole point of increasing energy prices is to reduce individual freedom. That’s the whole agenda in a nutshell.


13 posted on 09/14/2011 1:56:00 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

“But OBAMA OWNS THIS 100%”

Not exactly-—IF he can keep his lsm munchkins publicizing the LIE that Bush did it.


14 posted on 09/14/2011 2:00:47 PM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freeangel
Not exactly-—IF he can keep his lsm munchkins publicizing the LIE that Bush did it.

I heard Rush say that ABC just reported that in Bush's last two weeks in office Solyndra asked for the loan guarantee and Bush turned them down.

Of course, Obama could say, "Yeah, it's Bush's fault because if he had given them the loan guarantee, then I wouldn't have had to do it. So either way with this result it's Bush's fault."
15 posted on 09/14/2011 2:06:56 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Of course, Obama could say, "Yeah, it's Bush's fault because if he had given them the loan guarantee, then I wouldn't have had to do it. So either way with this result it's Bush's fault."

Y'know, aruanan, there's enough english on your comment to qualify you for a job on the Obummer 2012 campaign's propoganda team.

16 posted on 09/14/2011 2:34:18 PM PDT by woofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: woofer
Y'know, aruanan, there's enough english on your comment to qualify you for a job on the Obummer 2012 campaign's propoganda team.

Thanks. I try to think like the enemy. It's weird, no matter how abusive my comments to the emails I get from Barry and friends, they still keep sending me more emails asking me to join their team. Ha ha ha ha.
17 posted on 09/14/2011 4:33:57 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
“We wouldn't be in this mess if we had passed cap and trade”

Exactly. The whole ‘green economy’ was predicated on Cap and Trade and extremely high energy prices in a global warming world.

The real scandal is not the $550 million pounded down the Solyndra rat hole, nor the other $758 million pounded down other similar ventures that have went belly up recently in a lower profile fashion.

The real scandal is the TRILLION plus dollars we have paid in higher gasoline bills due to Obama’s no drill/no development policy on oil and the resultant skyrocketing energy prices his moratorium has forced on Americans

18 posted on 09/15/2011 1:11:10 AM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

I am wondering if the SEC should get involved here too- if they invested $$ based on Obama promises of Cap and Trade being passed ...

I bet they set this up so that they would have made billions if cap and trade passed


19 posted on 09/15/2011 6:54:15 AM PDT by Mr. K (Palin/Bachman 2012- unbeatable ticket~!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dead

Not only did the Bush administration NOT APPROVE the loan, their forecast was that the company would be bankrupt by 9/2011.


20 posted on 09/15/2011 8:02:34 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? You are a socialist idiot with no rational argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson