I repeat, the CHIEF JUSTICE DECLINED to resolve the issue and SPECIFICALLY said they would not need to do so because it was not relevant to the case. THEY DID NOT RULE THAT THERE IS ONLY ONE DEFINITION OF NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.
Don’t believe it. I don’t care. But it is in the case.
And
YES, Nguyen is relevant because the oral arguments show you what the Justices are thinking and it also shows you that IT IS NOT SETTLED LAW.
They discuss Jus Soli, Jus sanguinis and the ability to run for President.
It is LUDRICOUS for ANYONE to claim this is settled law.
You seem a bit “unsettled” yourself lady! HAW
JC