Sure honey, keep telling yourself that.
She is 100 percent correct.
My order of candidates.
Palin
Cain
Santorum
Bachmann
And that is it. If one of those four patriotic conservative Americans are not our candidate then I am writing in Palin. I will repeat myself. If the American people don’t want a true conservative from one of those four patriotic conservative Americans than I want nothing to do with the party and will write in Palin. I am sick and tired of these RINOs that they true to force on us. I considered holding my nose again for Perry but his arrogance and sassy mouth calling me heartless because I refuse to give aliens free bennies is fine. He can think that way about me but I will not vote for him.
Bachmann cannot answer a simple question. She lost me when she was asked what percentage of income someone should be allowed to keep and she said 100%.
Bachmann is, of course, correct. Whomever the nominee is, we need a true conservative now more than ever.
Nominating Romney or, less plausibly, Huntsman would be a disaster not only for the party but more importantly for the nation.
Then why is she running interference for The Mittster?
Bachmann is not going to get out of the race until her book comes out in Nov
Sarah Palin or Herman Cain best fit the bill.
I agree with her.
She, Cain and Santorum are it.
“the complete skill set”
Well that eliminates you.........
Isn’t Bachmann the lady that raised 1000 children and later rented a grandpa, Ed Rollins?
I guess she’s ending her campaign because she doesn’t have “the complete skill set.”
True Conservatives don’t LIE on National TV, Michelle. You did!
I still say reading the text of Sarah and Michele's speeches tells me they are the most conservative candidates. I want a conservative for President and Vice President. To me it's all pretty simple. . . What candidates give our country the best chance of long term survival?
Think of your grandkids. . and their unborn grandkids. .
I'll close with an open invitation to libs to read the text of Sarah and Michele's speeches. Maybe start with Sarah's Indianola speech. If you honestly disagree with her 5 point plan, then move to Cuba.
Bachmann repeatedly urged people not to settle on a moderate candidate who is seen as better able to cobble together the diverse coalition of voters needed to beat President Barack Obama. "This message has to be driven home by conservatives: We can't settle. We can't settle. We have to have a candidate who has it all," she said.
I believe she also said in that speech that you need to have raised at least 22 foster children to be the right candidate. We shouldn’t settle for anything less than that either.
And they have to not be an idiot.
Same thing Rush said today, when he listed, her, Cain and Rick. All three true conservatives. If Newt did not have all the baggage you could add him. When it comes to beating obummer I have no problem with any of the four. I would even throw Willard in if push come to shove. But there is no way in hell that I would vote for the Texas amnesty pusher, Perry.
She’s a conservative, just not the right conservative. I have qualms about her lack of experience. She was an IRS lawyer and a Representative. No executive experience at all. Look where that has gotten us, granted in a Marxist package, but still...
Herman Cain is the right conservative with the right experience. His background and skill in turning around failing companies will help us turn around this failing country.