>No slow one, the judge and the man with the gun have their power because the represent the will of the people.
Several things:
1) You assume that someone in an official uniform has a legal authority. {Counter example: A sheriff not in his own county.}
2) You assume that that legal authority represents the will of the people. {Counter example: The TSA.}
3) You misconstrue what I asked, either purposefully or ignorantly, which was “what legal authority does the federal government have to regulate drugs, especially considering that a Constitutional amendment was required to take that same regulatory power in the case of the drug alcohol? “
4) You call me slow because I ask you to explain your reasoning, why?
>When the dope heads become the majority the judge and the man with the gun will represent them.
That is the inherent problem of a Democracy, not [necessarily of] a Republic like our Constitution lays out.