Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Adder
The exporter of the ebony fingerboard blanks was Atheena Exports of India, established in 1985 "main objectives of manufacturing and exporting wooden parts of musical instruments."

It shows three ebony guitar fingerboard products with these measurements:

1. 500 x 70/60 x 9.0 mm

2. 530 x 70/60 x 9.0 mm

3. 700 x 70/60 x 9.0 mm

The photo of the product is this:

You'll see that it has the slots already cut for frets. That, to me, is a finished product.

The product that was shipped to the USA with Luthier Mercantile as the importer was rough-cut blanks of ebony in the following dimensions, with no slots for frets:

1. 510-530 x 75/70 x 10mm

2. 510-530 x 72/62 x 10mm

Gibson admits that it was going to finish the surface and edges of the blanks to size. Gibson has outstanding technology called a Plek machine that cuts its grooves for frets on the fingerboards.

I've said that I don't think the government's position is workable. However, these were not finished products. Atheena sent rough cut blanks instead of its finished product and filled out export paperwork for a finished product.

The importer, LMI, took paperwork that identified these blanks coded as "9902" and described as 'finished parts for a musical instrument" under the Harmonized System established by the World Customs Organization, and changed the code to "4408" and the description to "VENEER SHEET <=6MM OTH, OT" on the import form. 4407 would have been "chipped, split, or cut wood >6MM" and would have been illegal to export from India.

LMI knew these were not finished parts for a musical instrument, or else why would they change the code from 9902 and go to the trouble of changing the description?

There's plenty to argue about regarding the raid - but these were not finished parts for a musical instrument.

And you'll note that nothing I said implicated Gibson in any way in changing codes, falsely describing the contents upon import, or falsely describing the contents upon export. Nor in putting the name of a false consignee on the papers.

But this was a shady import deal.

18 posted on 10/06/2011 12:08:49 PM PDT by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Scoutmaster

Thank you for the enlightenment. My original focus was the line in the article that said India said they were shipped legally.

To me, that should have been the end of the story. I see it is not, however.


19 posted on 10/06/2011 12:14:40 PM PDT by Adder (Say NO to the O in 2 oh 12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson