Waahhhh someone cited precedent I don’t like. Booohooo... I know! I’ll refer to him as a “useful idiot... spewing... vomitous deceit” and a “stealth liar.”
Good sir, I never said WHY the founders did what they did, just what they did. So your anger over “your other lies are why the founders wrote an exception clause into the Constitution” must be confusing me with someone else. The basis for the provision was concern that someone could become President that was an enemy of the nation or had allegience to a foreign nation. That still doesn’t change the fact that the constitution requires Natural Born Citizenship (not Native Born) and following the logic you seem to support that a number of presidents would be ineligible for the post they served. Sorry to cite history and not merely relying on insulting accusations as seems to be your tactic.
Don’t call me good sir, you quisiling asshat liar. You are here to spew and dissemble, you know it, I know it, and the readership know it. You hope to create confusion, but are too stupid to realize you’re on Freerepublic where these issues have been discussed at length. Twisitng the terms around and playing alinskyesque word games exposes your agenda immediately, asshat.
That still doesn’t change the fact that the constitution requires Natural Born Citizenship (not Native Born)
Yes. And I’ll repeat that your definition of these two terms are 100 percent bas-ackward. You really do need to get your facts straight.
You are the most laughable thing I have seen yet coming from the ranks of the opposition. A history lesson (or a good intellectual drubbing) would be wasted on you. You would have to start a cram course of research just to get up to squeeky's level of incompetence.
Should you decide to throw off your ignorance, a good place to start would be here.