“quisiling asshat liar”— again why the namecalling?
“You are here to spew and dissemble, you know it, I know it, and the readership know it. You hope to create confusion, but are too stupid to realize you’re on Freerepublic where these issues have been discussed at length.”- I don’t really understand who you are accusing me of being but read through some of my other posts. While I disagree with some people on here I am generally conservative.
“Twisitng the terms around and playing alinskyesque word games exposes your agenda immediately, asshat.”-— so wait citing history is now “twisting terms” to you? Or is it citing legal definitions that you have a problem with? I still have yet to see an actual rebuttal of either from you. I’m sorry facts seem to stand in the way of your view of the world. I agree with the other posts I’ve read here that we have to uphold the constitution from Progressive assault but that doesn’t mean we have to also uphold misunderstandings of the text’s terms as you are currently exhibiting.
You tried to pass off deceit as History. You know that the parents, according to the birther argument, need to be U.S. citizens at the time of the birth of the child, yet you tried to twist that into something to play your axelfraud games. You liberal scum are disgusting, and most disgusting when you try to lie your way along, claiming to be conservative. I’m just pulling your cloak of deception off, asshat, exposing you for the lying agitprop you are. If you really wanted to know more on the arguments both ways, you would read the numerous threads discussing the issues. But that isn’t your agenda. You are a liar at heart, an enemy of conervatism workign FR to cause as much confusion as you can muster.