Thanks for the Perry-bot pretzel logic.
CAIN: I believe that life begins at conception. And abortion under no circumstances. And heres why
MORGAN: No circumstances?
CAIN: No circumstances.
MORGAN: Because many of your fellow candidates some of them qualify that.
CAIN: They qualify but
MORGAN: Rape and incest.
CAIN: Rape and incest. Cain is specifically rejecting exceptions to anti-abortion laws that other candidates have put forth allowing abortion in cases of rape and incest.
MORGAN: Are you honestly saying again, its a tricky question, I know.
CAIN: Ask the tricky question.
MORGAN: But youve had children, grandchildren. If one of your female children, grand children was raped, you would honestly want her to bring up that baby as her own?
CAIN: Youre mixing two things here, Piers?
MORGAN: Why?
CAIN: Youre mixing
MORGAN: Thats what it comes down to.
CAIN: No, it comes down to its not the governments role or anybody elses role to make that decision. Secondly, if you look at the statistical incidents, youre not talking about that big a number. So what Im saying is it ultimately gets down to a choice that that family or that mother has to make.
Cain clearly states he is anti abortion.
Cain then answers Morgan's stupid question about a mother "BRINGING UP" a baby.
Cain's a regular person. He thought they were having a regular conversation so he pivoted to answer the new question which he clearly recognized because he pointed out that Morgan was mixing topics.
I don't question Cain's commitment to pro-life issues and HotAir, purportedly "right-leaning" media, should be sensible enough to look at the transcript and follow the threads of conversation. Of course, that would be fair-minded and honest. It wouldn't get any site hits either and they exist to pull in ad traffic.
Most of the supposed flip-flops from Cain are down to his inexperience at speaking like a politician instead of a normal person. It's a problem because the "game" is rigged against non-politicians.