This is preposterous. Here’s the transcript of the Morgan/Cain conversation:
http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/herman_cains_self_inflicted_abortion_problem/singleton/
Cain’s “choice” comment was NOT referring to ABORTION, but rather whether a victim of rape should rear the child.
MORGAN: But youve had children, grandchildren. If one of your female children, grandchildren was raped, you would honestly want her to bring up that baby as her own?
CAIN: Youre mixing two things here, Piers?
MORGAN: Why?
CAIN: Youre mixing
MORGAN: Thats what it comes down to.
CAIN: No, it comes down to its not the governments role or anybody elses role to make that decision. Secondly, if you look at the statistical incidents, youre not talking about that big a number. So what Im saying is it ultimately gets down to a choice that that family or that mother has to make.
You are actually agreeing with him. Look at Morgan’s question, he was asking about ‘bringing the baby up’, not aborting the baby.
People are being manipulated.. they are being told what was said in the headline or first sentence of the article, not actually digging in and logically reading what was said.
Look at it again from a old FReeper media skeptic like we used to have here. What specifically did Morgan ask, what did Cain respond? (not what we are told he asked and what we are told he responded to)..
Focus only on the parenthetical (actual quotes for those in Rio Linda), not the ‘editorialized’ comments in between.
Cain’s last line is not pro-life...it’s pro-choice...