It doesn't work that way. The Sheriff can keep Obama off the ballot (in his county) unless Obama complies to the Sheriff's satisfaction. Obama would have to go to court to stop him, at which time the Sheriff can present evidence and demand discovery. Not a good move for Obama.
Wouldn’t a dispute between states instead require a federal court filing?
If the Sheriff wanted something from Hawaii, sure. But Obama wants something from Maricopa county, (ballot access.) not the other way around. If Jan Brewer hadn't been such a backstabber, the entire State would be a trap for Obama.
” - - - - The Sheriff can keep Obama off the ballot (in his county) unless Obama complies to the Sheriff’s satisfaction. “
This is a great idea! Let pressure State Attorney Generals to do the same!
Just because Barack Hussein Obama II, born in Mombasa, Kenya in the Coast Provincial General Hospital, fooled us once about his “Hawaii” birthplace, is no reason for us not to demand his true certificate of birth for the 2012 AMERICAN National Election.
Still batting .000 I see.
1. No Sheriff, in any county in the United States, controls access to the ballot.
2. This "posse" is a posse in the modern sense, a group of hangers on who inflate the ego of a public person, not an official (if volunteer) part of law enforcement. A real, official, investigation, could go to the grand jury, and seek a grand jury subpoena of any public records relevant to its investigation. It wouldn't have to whine about how its lack of access to those records hinders its "investigation."