[Sudetenland]

"If you’re not capable of understanding what Cain said then you’re completely incapable of posting on this forum with any interesting insight."

Glad you recognize the Cainiacs' flaws. Anytime you become so emotionally attached to a candidate that you are incapable of believing anything at all negative about them--without even investigating them or questioning your beliefs--then you are seriously in danger of being led by your emotions rather than your brain.

The words that Cain spoke were unambiguously naive. If he meant that they were pursuing a nuclear naval capability, then he should have expressly said so. He didn't, so he is vulnerable to being called pathetically naive--just like he was pathetically naive on what was meant by "right of return." The man is not qualified to be President of the United States if he is that naive and ambiguous in his understanding and positions on foreign policy issues.

[Carl from Marietta]

I’m sorry..perhaps it’s semantics, but I’ve lived in the deep south all my life and this is the way people talk down here. We put the subject forward first. I understood the man the first time, the same way I understood his position on abortion. If it’s not playing well with you then perhaps he needs to have advisers to tell him how to break with his background and speak more clearly.

I’m serious, I’ve seen this on more than one occasion down here. Sometimes syntax and whatnot can be misunderstood.