[lahargis]

I believe one woman’s attorney is trying to get her released from the settlement agreement to give her side of the story. Hopefully, the NRA will release her and she can tell her side of the story.

[fireman15]

I believe one woman’s attorney is trying to get her released from the settlement agreement to give her side of the story.

Well if you had been watching or listening to the news today you might have heard that the lady's media whore attorney had to admit that his “client” didn't want to come forward and she also didn't want him to ask the NRA to release her from her confidentiality agreement.

My wife and I both know several persons who were the recipients of “sexual harassment” “settlements” all of them had similar nondisclosure agreements. Every nondisclosure agreements we are aware of were more for the purpose of keeping other employees from finding out how easy it was to extract money from their employers not to protect the accused.

[fireman15]

Sorry forgot the quotes! "I believe one woman’s attorney is trying to get her released from the settlement agreement to give her side of the story.

[MHGinTN]

She already told a story, and the NRA doled out a severance package to get the harridan off their team. You seem awfully quick to lend credulity to a woman who has played gold digger, and you do it without a shred of evidence other than some media sycophancy to the DNC is telling you a tale. How crazy is that? It doesn't help Rick Perry to be so naive, shucks it doesn't even help Milt Rominy. It only helps the criminal enterprise democrap goonsquad ... and you need to realize that sooner rather than later, unless you share their goal in this innuendo based lynching of a Christian man.

[mikhailovich]

Why do we need to hear one woman's side of the story when its already been heard and settled in a civil action? Allegations that came up 12 years ago do not need to be repeated today when they've already been resolved in a settlement agreement.

Look, I don't support Cain. I hope he loses support because of his inconsistent statements and poor handling of this crisis, but I don't want it to happen as a result of some National Enquirer-style dirty laundry interviews of these women.

We don't prosecute someone TWICE in this country for the same crime, why should we give these women the microphone TWICE?