Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
Unbelievable

This is the same BS that the muslims try to pull. Also the democrats. They take no responsibility for people acting on their own to try to sabotage a rival. They say it does not reflect on them or their organization.

Again, if it's true, then Perry cannot run a couple of hundred employees, how is he going to run a couple of hundred thousand employees?

188 posted on 11/02/2011 7:24:14 PM PDT by oldbrowser (Democrats have no superego.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]


To: oldbrowser

And now we read innuendo aimed at sullying Rick Perry for something a rogue could have easily done. And if you doubt it, look at the spittlefool who started this thread with his scurrilous crap! He claims to be an ardent Perry supporter. ... And no one querstions that when he is making so much filth that it is splashing on Rick? Pleae, fellow freeprs, take a deep breath and stop helping these fools herd minds.


273 posted on 11/02/2011 8:18:32 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

To: oldbrowser

My point is simply that some members of organizations operate independently thinking they do good. If Perry truly did not know and did not authorize, then it truly is not his responsibility in terms of culpability.

I agree that leaders should have better control of their organizations, so he would have a responsibility in terms of the leadership climate he has established.


434 posted on 11/03/2011 5:44:49 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson