You're post makes no sense. However, I will answer your two direct questions:
No, I have never worked for the NRA.
I can, correctly, say that the allegations are unfounded because as of this moment, no one has come forward with any first hand evidence stating otherwise. The fact that a dirt ball employment lawyer mentions he was involved in a settlement and then goes into non-specifics does not provide founding for a smear campaign. His "client" does not wish to discuss the matter. The fact that a pollster who has worked for Rove and is connected to the Perry camp says he saw an un-named woman in a public restaurant being offended by Cain does not provide first hand evidence of a pattern of sexual harassment.
I know a few people who have been on the receiving end of sexual harrasment complaints which were just total BS. I know the lawyers who specialize in this field are, for the most part, out for financial enrichment and not justice for the accuser or accused.
So, until we know something other than some un-named sources say that Cain committed some un named offensive acts, they are unfounded. Is that clear enough?
Those women were not the leakers, someone else — likely someone at NRA — leaked it. They cannot speak out and it is reported one of them is in hiding over this. You are all blaming the wrong people in my opinion and so far we are all allowed to have one.