I can’t believe this second source never went to the men’s room or whatever. And if it is the same night that the woman supposedly ended up in Cain’s apartment, the group was said to have split into two at some point.
Someone is racist! I’m just sayin because that is exactly what they would be saying if this were 0bama...and we all know it would never be 0bama because the media wouldn’t touch it with a 10 foot pole. So basically its not okay to be racist to the half black guy but to the real black guy....no race card applies.
Amen, and now they’ve changed the name of the restaurant. There is a first person witness to B.O. sitting in the back seat of a limo and getting serviced, orally, by the witness while doing a line of coke (the powered kind). This first person witness came forward, named himself, made himself availabe for interviews, and couldn’t get 2 minutes of coverage from the network suits, but look what they’re doing to Cain with a bunch of “un-named sources”. This whole thing makes me so sick that I don’t even care if he did it or not. He’s gonna get my support, all the way.
Weak. This is not much of a boost to the Cain side. Wilson had said someone finally told Cain to cool it, that it was embarrassing.
I think we are going to discover why Herb likes to make it clear that he drinks only wine now. After three short years as corporate hound and after lifting the company of 80 grand to the two girls and with now reportedly a third talking, Cain needs to sober up and stick with his wine.
Who would hire him with the baggage? This is why he went into the padded room with a microphone to do radio. I always thought that was a weird transition from the board roomm to the sound room.
>Somebody’s lying.<
And it ain’t Cain!
Herman Cain was on Hannity a while ago. And he was great! Now Hannity is replaying his montage of the ugly things said about Mr.Cain! Hannity is a Romneybopt.
Not necessarily. Just because this guy didn't see anything improper doesn't mean it didn't occur. I am not suggesting anything improper occurred but am just stating the fallibility of your premise