[RoosterRedux]

IMO it's better for this stuff to be dragged into the light than to be allowed to lurk in the shadows. Then we can hear the specifics and Cain can defend himself before the American people.

[brent13a]

If this is an altogether new woman whom is going to claim sexual harassment from 12-15 years ago that she never originally reported, then it should be easy to handle.
It should be far outside of the statute of limitations and Cain can simply deny it any which way he wants to. At this point his campaign could easily paint her as going after the limelight simply for money and make her and Allred look like the money-grubbing jackholes they are.

[MHGinTN]

There is an emerging pattern from n00bs posting on the Herman Cain threads ... perhaps exposing the axelrod talking points to be ‘Herman should face the press and take all questions’, thus the leftist trap can be sprung on Herman. I hate democrats, and I loathe their agitprop lying Internet operatives pretending to be conservatives on consewrvative websites. Scum and villainy they are

[Smokin' Joe]

IMO it's better for this stuff to be dragged into the light than to be allowed to lurk in the shadows. Then we can hear the specifics and Cain can defend himself before the American people.

That is the problem so far--there haven't been any specifics. Just vague allegations without witnesses or complaintants.

I have a distinct feeling that this is likely to be more pumped up BS, but we'll see.

I'd like to hear the specifics of what he allegedly did (the action or words which allegedly caused offense). There is so much out there which reeks of settlement mongering rather than actual offensive behaviour.