Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tribune7
Why would the VP of Finance be involved in discussions concerning a report of a sex with a minor?

Duh. Curley reports to him.

196 posted on 11/08/2011 4:36:24 PM PST by NewinTexsas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: NewinTexsas
Why would the VP of Finance be involved in discussions concerning a report of a sex with a minor?

Duh. Curley reports to him.

So, in other words, Curley just 'reported it to his superior' the way Joe Paterno did? Then why is everyone upset with Curley?

Obviously, I'm being sarcastic. Curley didn't call the police (wait - strike that, Joe Paterno, didn't, either).

I was being sarcastic about being sarcastic. Curley committed perjury. Although I am puzzled by the fact that he was charged with not reporting the abuse. Because he did report the abuse . . . to his supervisor, if Curley does report to Schultz.

But is anyone beginning to see why it's hard to give Joe Paterno a pass on this? Particularly when prosecutors are being so careful not to release anything regarding McQueary's statements about what he claimed to have told Joe Paterno. That one piece is missing from the GJ presentment and the GJ report. With respect to every other conversation, we know what a party claims to have said, and what the other party (or parties) claims to have been told. Paterno says he wasn't told the damning details . . . but we never hear what McQueary claims to have told Joe Paterno.

204 posted on 11/08/2011 4:58:34 PM PST by Scoutmaster (I stand for something; therefore, I can't stand Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson