[Arthur McGowan]

“Move On.” Where have I heard that before?

“Move on” is what guilty people say. The attempt to destroy Herman Cain is not something Cain needs to be ashamed of. It’s a badge of honor. And it IS a “real” issue that people should care about—because it shows just how far Cain’s enemies—whether Perry, Romney, or Obama—will go to knock him out of the race. If the subject comes up, watch for Cain to give a strong answer, and his Republican enemies (I don’t call them “opponents”) to give mealy-mouthed responses in which they attempt to keep open the “possibility” that Cain is guilty.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

The best thing that could happen in tonight’s debate is for each of the other candidates to refuse to discuss these allegations of harassment. We collectively should shift the national conversation to the things that really matter.

2 posted on November 9, 2011 9:41:22 AM EST by LOC1

Exactly.

“Move On.” Where have I heard that before?

“Move on” is what guilty people say. The attempt to destroy Herman Cain is not something Cain needs to be ashamed of. It’s a badge of honor. And it IS a “real” issue that people should care about—because it shows just how far Cain’s enemies—whether Perry, Romney, or Obama—will go to knock him out of the race.

The fact that Cain is under an Alinsky attack is what is the only legitimate point to be made WRT these attacks.

If the subject comes up, watch for Cain to give a strong answer, and his Republican enemies (I don’t call them “opponents”) to give mealy-mouthed responses in which they attempt to keep open the “possibility” that Cain is guilty.

. . . which is precisely the opposite of what LOC1 urged.