Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Free Vulcan
You have ZERO proof that Joe knew. ZERO. The grand jury report provides no evidence as such. You have ZERO proof that Joe protected him or covered it up.

The grand jury report states that Joe was told what McQueary had seen. McQueary states he saw Sandusky raping a ten year old. Joe knew.

249 posted on 11/11/2011 9:34:15 AM PST by NewinTexsas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]


To: NewinTexsas

In 2002. After Sandusky was retired. Even then the AD and the VP still said there was nothing there. He had the word of one man v. the entire PSU apparatus.

Now, should Joe have made the effort to put 2+2 together and realize there was something there and followed up? Yes he should have. He didn’t because or moral cowardice, self-absorbedness, CYA, and negligent inaction and just didn’t want to see. That doesn’t mean he KNEW and you certainly can’t prove with the info we have that he KNEW in 1998.

And it certainly doesn’t mean he protected Sandusky. We have no evidence he used his position to do so.


253 posted on 11/11/2011 9:47:33 AM PST by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson