Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rossi E-Cat Sales Web Site Goes Live
http://www.leonardo-ecat.com/fp/ ^ | 11/11/2011 | Self

Posted on 11/11/2011 4:42:22 PM PST by Johnny B.

E-Cat Technology by Andrea Rossi of Leonardo Corporation


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canr; cmns; coldfusion; ecat; energy; energycatalyzer; fatima; hurryhurryhurry; lanr; lenr; miracle; motion; perpetual; rossi; sourcetitlenoturl; steprightup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-156 last
To: Kevmo

The Video is entitled, “Cold Fusion: Physcists Sven Kullander and Hanno Essén interviewed about the Rossi-Focardi cell”

Here’s the English transcript:
http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3111124.ece

The translation to the second link above, which is an invitation to a lecture in a week, in part reads:

But maybe all these planned large-scale facilities will compete with small reactors that could be the private property of every man and woman. Cold fusion has been developed recently in Bologna can be housed in an apparatus which is not much bigger than a coffee maker and generating energy only with a few teaspoons of nickel powder.

An intensive discussion on the net have questioned the experiment in Bologna mainly because it can not be explained by the established nuclear physics theory. It has also been speculated that the derivative produced heat energy must have been greatly overestimated mainly by an overestimation of the buildup of steam. At the lecture, these issues will be treated in order to gain a better understanding of the experiment in Bologna. ”

It’s time for the nay-sayers to discredit some Swedish scientists too.


141 posted on 11/15/2011 9:47:20 PM PST by Sundog (When Hollywood defines reality there is no reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
*** The statue is still there. You can go see it now.
And yet hundreds of live witnesses, and millions of TV viewers saw it disappear. That is far more convincing than anything Rossi has done, and yet it was obviously a trick.
Similarly, you can prove that Rossi is a fraud by getting a buncha buddies together and buying one.
I'm not in the habit of giving my money to con artists. Don't let me stop you, though.
142 posted on 11/16/2011 3:13:43 AM PST by Johnny B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
That leaves only 2 possibilities. Either Rossi is a scam artist or it’s the real deal.
I would agree with this statement. I suppose it's possible that Rossi is completely psychotic, but I don't believe that.

Rossi's claims are so grandiose that they can't be based on honest error. He claims to have heated his factory for six months with his E-Cat, using only a single charge of "fuel". This would be exactly the kind of demonstration that the skeptics have been begging for.

Too bad that Rossi has absolutely no evidence that he has actually done this.

143 posted on 11/16/2011 3:17:20 AM PST by Johnny B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Sundog
The Video is entitled, “Cold Fusion: Physcists Sven Kullander and Hanno Essén interviewed about the Rossi-Focardi cell”
I find it interesting that in the video, it's clear that their support of Rossi is based entirely on believing everything that Rossi says. For example, they mention that he has "heated his factory for a year using the E-Cat". Unfortunately, there is no actual evidence that he has done anything like this.

Scientists work on the assumption that their peers are honest. This is necessary to avoid having to start each experiment from first principles. However, it leaves very little protection against fraud.

The solution to detecting fraud is to have others repeat experiments and verify similar results. However, Rossi refuses to allow this to happen. Therefore, Rossi is "cheating" the scientific process.

He is welcome to do so, but as long as he does, any claims he makes should be disregarded.

144 posted on 11/16/2011 3:24:10 AM PST by Johnny B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
You’re way off, and you’re headed down a track that is obviously blazed by your emotions. You won’t even look at the scientific evidence because you’re all wrapped up in the appearance of a con artist. You simply cannot see past it. And that is not due to your logical reasoning, it is due to your emotions.

Seriously? You should know by now that my skepticism of Rossi's claims is based completely in science. It is not up to me to prove that the non-scientist Rossi's claims of having achieved transmutation of elements in a way incompatible with the laws of physics; it is up to Rossi to show that he has. I've even discussed the nature of the easily obtained evidence that would support such a claim. And he has shown nothing yet.

As far as feelings go, when I see someone whose behavior patterns are objectively similar to those displayed by con artists in the past--that is, e.g., I can read that a past con artist always had some explanation as to why his "invention" could not be tested by an independent party, and Rossi also does not allow testing by an independent party--then it is safe to say that I have a feeling that Rossi will, in fact, engage in another behavior that is consistent with that of con men. I cannot have objective evidence of an action that will occur in the future.

That last sentence actually exists in a bit of a grey area. A few months ago, the claims were that this device was going to replace all known methods of power generation, and that power plant operators might as well start dismantling their plants, since they were about to be made obsolete. But now, the claim is only that the device is a heater, with power generation still in the future. So it does almost appear that Rossi is already engaged in the behavior of promising that the big breakthrough is just around the corner.

145 posted on 11/16/2011 4:59:27 AM PST by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Johnny B.

I recall the brilliant scientists of MIT when Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann were hard at work. Openly, they derided him in the extreme. Behind the scenes, they filed a slug of patents on ways to possibly use the technology. We have a world of blithering hypocrites. Something like powered flight comes along and the rage to stop it and deny it because God didn’t give man wings becomes fervent.


146 posted on 11/16/2011 9:19:49 AM PST by Sundog (When Hollywood defines reality there is no reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Sundog
I recall the brilliant scientists of MIT when Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann were hard at work. Openly, they derided him in the extreme. Behind the scenes, they filed a slug of patents on ways to possibly use the technology.
Wow! I don't know who that rant is aimed at, but if you really hate MIT that much, here's something to cheer you up:

All those patents you say they got when Pons and Fleischmann were getting all of their publicity have by now expired, presumably without ever earning MIT so much as a penny.

147 posted on 11/16/2011 11:31:34 AM PST by Johnny B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
Rossi's E-Cat Sales Web Site, Version 2!

http://ecat.com

Much prettier than the last attempt. This one drops the escrow account part, but does claim to ship in three months.

(Posted to Kevmo to pass on to the Cold Fusion ping list.)

148 posted on 11/16/2011 1:29:16 PM PST by Johnny B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Johnny B.


And yet hundreds of live witnesses, and millions of TV viewers saw it disappear.
***And yet there are witnesses to the heat generation of Rossi's E-Cat. That would make Rossi a far better magician than anyone else because he's doing the trick right in front of them while they have physical access to it. They have weighed it, looked under it, torn it apart, dunked it in water to get its density, all kinds of things.


Again I like what Jed has to say.



Re: [Vo]: Rossi Deserves Our Gratitude
Jed Rothwell
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:01:28 -0800

Mary Yugo wrote:


> You keep saying the results of Rossi's demos were obvious but there is
> continuing disagreement over that from very smart people so you could be
> wrong.
>

I do not know any very smart people who say this. All of the scientists
I know who have examined the results are convinced. They include people
such as Kullander, who is chairman of the Royal Academy of Sciences Energy
Committee. I am certain that he knows more about energy than you do. I am
sure he knows more about energy than all of skeptics tied together.

The people who dispute these results have never offered any valid technical
reasons to back up their assertions. For example, Jones Beene claimed that
the calorimetry during the 18-hour flowing water test might be off by a
factor of 1000, but he never gave any reasons why this is possible. Other
people said that the input power might be measured incorrectly in that
test, but that is impossible because the wires would burn up if there was
that much electricity being input.

You have never offered any technical reasons for any of your claims. You
say that there may be a stage magician somewhere on Earth who knows some
method of doing a fake test of this nature. That is not falsifiable so it
is not a scientific assertion. Whenever anyone asks you for a scientific
reason, you change the subject and point to Rossi's personality, and then
you say he might be a fraud, and then you talk about Steorn. You are
evading the issue.

In the last year I have not seen a a single valid technical objection to
Rossi's claims. I'm sure that if the skeptics could come up with something
by now if they could.

That is not to say Rossi's tests have been perfect. I myself have pointed
out many weaknesses. However these weaknesses have no impact on the
conclusion. Any experiment has weaknesses. Even the most irrefutable
demonstration of a phenomenon could always be done with better
instrumentation or more rigor.



> You and others persist in making unlikely excuses for Rossi.
>

I never make excuses for anyone, least of all myself. My belief is in
Rossi's claims, based on physics, not in the man himself.


Rossi's problem is a failure to conduct his tests properly and to get
> independent testing. The skeptics merely point this out.
>

I POINT THIS OUT. Often.



> They also point out simple and safe, inexpensive ways to remedy the
> problems.
>

These problem are annoying but unimportant.



> It's Rossi's fault, not the fault of the skeptics, that he doesn't follow
> your advice, much less skeptics' advice.
>

Yes, but his failure to follow this advice has no bearing whatever on the
reality of his claim. That is based solely on fundamental physics and it
would not change even if it Rossi turns out to be a fraud and an ax
murderer to boot.


Also: Please stop saying that I accuse Rossi of lying about his technical
claims. I said very clearly that I have NEVER seen him do that. Perhaps he
has lied but I have never caught him saying anything which was not either
true or that he did not indicate was pure speculation.

He has said some dubious things about personal matters such as his PhD from
the diploma mill, his reasons for breaking with Defkalion, and about me,
personally. That has nothing to do with the scientific claims.

I think he sometimes practices misdirection and selective leaking of facts.
Every inventor I have ever heard of did this. Edison was a master at that.
IBM held a gigantic share of the computer market decades longer than they
might have, partly thanks to their masterful use of this technique.

- Jed








--------------------------------------------------

Re: [Vo]:Best and worst aspects of the Oct. 6 test summarized at LENR-CANR News
Jed Rothwell
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:27:43 -0700

Terry Blanton wrote:


> > And many people are paid for performing grand illusions that
> > cannot be exposed by observers in audience and live television.
>
> And who is going to pay Rossi for a hoax? This engineer will tell you
> that none of us will be fooled.
>

Yeah! About those stage magicians: they only fool you because you are in the
audience, not on stage. Put Terry on the stage for a few minutes, let him go
behind the apparatus, and he will tell you how the trick works.

Special effects in movies are blatantly obvious when you are on the sound
stage, watching them film. Look here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2001_CENTRIFUGE_SET.jpg

Do you think anyone would mistake this for an actual space ship?


This notion that "fakers" or "scammers" can fool engineers is silly. I been
watching this business for nearly 20 years. I have heard of many scammers
and met a few in person. They did not fool me or any other knowledgeable
person.

There are claims difficult to judge. There have been confused people, or
people who had complicated machines that took time to understand. Especially
the magnet machines. There are cold fusion experiments claiming effects
close to the margin of error, such as 2% excess heat. That is hard to
confirm or deny. Those are all a different story. Rossi's machine is dead
simple from the point of view of calorimetry. Let's see a scammer or stage
magician disconnect the power from a box with 30 L of boiling water, change
out the water twice, and still have it boiling hot. Not gunna happen.

As I have often said, it is a lot easier to find blatant, deliberate fraud
than a subtle experimental error. Nature knows more ways to fool us than man
will ever dream up.

- Jed





149 posted on 11/16/2011 9:22:24 PM PST by Kevmo (When a thing is owned by everybody nobody gives value to it. Communism taught us this. ~A. Rossi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Johnny B.

Kevmo: That leaves only 2 possibilities. Either Rossi is a scam artist or it’s the real deal.
JB: I would agree with this statement. ... Rossi’s claims are so grandiose that they can’t be based on honest error.
***Good, then determining the truth will be easier. All this focus on measurements that only make 10% difference are meaningless. Eventually this will be either found out or accepted as real. The proliferation of buyers works against the scam hypothesis.

He claims to have heated his factory for six months with his E-Cat, using only a single charge of “fuel”. This would be exactly the kind of demonstration that the skeptics have been begging for.
***And if I were a buyer, I would insist on seeing it.

Too bad that Rossi has absolutely no evidence that he has actually done this.
***His buyers represent all the evidence he cares about. One thing this suggests is that Rossi easily could give a convincing demo to skeptics, but has chosen not to. I sometimes think this is a mistake but the Wright brothers were in the same position in 1905 when there was a steady stream of visitors asking for demos; their only requirement was that if they showed the device could fly, the person would be buying some units. No one accepted those conditions for 2 years. So, Rossi is doing the same thing.


150 posted on 11/16/2011 9:32:00 PM PST by Kevmo (When a thing is owned by everybody nobody gives value to it. Communism taught us this. ~A. Rossi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

Seriously?
***Yes, seriously. It is obvious that your objection to this development comes from emotion rather than critical & rational thinking.

It is not up to me to prove that the non-scientist Rossi’s claims of having achieved transmutation of elements in a way incompatible with the laws of physics; it is up to Rossi to show that he has.
***Rossi would be claiming no more than what several other LENR Researchers have seen.
Mizuno, T., Nuclear Transmutation: The Reality of Cold Fusion. 1998: Infinite Energy Press.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/external-search?mode=books&tag=thedesmoinescity&keyword=Nuclear+Transmutation+Cold+Fusion

A few months ago, the claims were that this device was going to replace all known methods of power generation, and that power plant operators might as well start dismantling their plants, since they were about to be made obsolete.
***Grandiosity appears to be part of the process of introducing new technology. The interesting thing here is, if this is real, those claims are correct.

But now, the claim is only that the device is a heater, with power generation still in the future.
***Rossi has been claiming all along that the first generation of ecats would be heaters.

So it does almost appear that Rossi is already engaged in the behavior of promising that the big breakthrough is just around the corner.
***If it “almost appears” to be the case then your writing would be far more emotionally cautious. Instead, you get a feeling that he’s a con artist and you go with it. In the field of LENR, we are lucky to see a good demo once every year or 2. Rossi has given 10 demos in the last year. His big breakthrough has already taken place, in that he got a customer to put cash on the barrel head for a LENR device. No one else even claims this. Now the ultraskeptics claim that there isn’t even a customer. The more customers there are, the wider the conspiracy theory becomes, until that theory pops like a balloon.


151 posted on 11/16/2011 9:41:06 PM PST by Kevmo (When a thing is owned by everybody nobody gives value to it. Communism taught us this. ~A. Rossi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

While you want to jump all over me for stating that I have a feeling that Rossi will engage in other con man behaviors, given the objectively observable con man behaviors he has already engaged, it is clear to me that your support of his claims is purely emotional.

Making excuse after excuse for his behavior, even after many people have pointed out the various ways in which Rossi doesn’t, as they say, “pass the smell test” is purely an emotional behavior.

I have to wonder, what is your motivation?

I hope you didn’t invest in it (and I mean actual investment, not playing around at some betting website).


152 posted on 11/17/2011 3:20:52 AM PST by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

It’s obvious your focus is on emotion because not one of your questions is about the science behind this development.


153 posted on 11/17/2011 10:10:00 PM PST by Kevmo (When a thing is owned by everybody nobody gives value to it. Communism taught us this. ~A. Rossi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
It’s obvious your focus is on emotion because not one of your questions is about the science behind this development.

Oh, I've questioned the "science" here many times.

154 posted on 11/18/2011 3:01:47 AM PST by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

“science”
***Emotionally charged, about what one would expect from someone approaching this subject leading with their emotions.


155 posted on 11/18/2011 7:17:46 PM PST by Kevmo (When a thing is owned by everybody nobody gives value to it. Communism taught us this. ~A. Rossi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: All


Just A Reminder
Please Don't Forget
To Donate To FR
This Quarter

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


156 posted on 11/18/2011 7:19:18 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-156 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson