[Kevmo]

Well, thanks for addressing the series of conditionals. Of course, I do not agree with you but at least most of what you post is fact based.

Here you are trying to confuse the issue by insinuating that if there is any validity to LENR, then Rossi must be valid as well.
***NO, that is not what I’m trying to do. It is an inductive argument, where it is very LIKELY to be true/valid, not necessarily MUST be true.

It is entirely possible that Rossi is a con man, using “cold fusion” as the basis of his frauds.
***And as the list of co-conspirators grows, the theory weakens proportionally.

[Johnny B.]

Here you are trying to confuse the issue by insinuating that if there is any validity to LENR, then Rossi must be valid as well.
***NO, that is not what I’m trying to do. It is an inductive argument, where it is very LIKELY to be true/valid, not necessarily MUST be true.

Your logic is flawed.

It is entirely possible that Rossi is a con man, using “cold fusion” as the basis of his frauds.
***And as the list of co-conspirators grows, the theory weakens proportionally.

As was pointed out earlier, these people you name are Rossi's partners, and they are not there in their capacity as University personnel.