Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KantianBurke
For now. When the indictments begin coming down we’ll see how old Joe fares. I’d wager obstruction of justice, conspiracy after the fact and/or enabling of a felony.

Indictments have come down, and the AG has expressly stated that Paterno isn't a target: "We believe that under the statute, he had an obligation to report it to the school administrators, and he did that," Kelly said.

Rumor has it there is one more indictment to come, and that's very likely Spanier IMO.

As an aside, it's funny to see you advocatinga view that additional facts might come out and that could change the current status of things. Considering your complete rush to judge all actors (including those not directly involved) based on an incomplete set of facts, it seems you'd like to have it both ways. A bit more intellectual consistency is in order, I think.

526 posted on 11/13/2011 11:56:50 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 525 | View Replies ]


To: NittanyLion

True this is just guess work on my part. However with Sandusky most likely going to go for a plea deal, he’s going to need to open up on a number of issues - one of which is what did Paterno know and when did he know it all the way back to 1998. And then there are the other folks involved that will get taken down by this scandal. Woe is Joe if they squeal in his direction.


531 posted on 11/13/2011 12:04:02 PM PST by KantianBurke (Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson