Of course it is. That’s what the base wants. That foreign policy debate clarified things for me. I had been trying to convince myself to vote for Newt, but after that debate, I decided I cannot vote for another hubristic, arrogant neocon. No thanks.
Buchanan is just sucking up to MSNBC, and his book, “How the Right Went Wrong” failed to sell.
War party? Is that the party of Wilson, FDR, JFK, and LBJ?
I said some time ago that John Bolton would make a good SOS. The president would have to go to Congress (unlike our current president)if he found it imperative to go to war.
As far as Iran goes, I think Mr. Cain would try everything possible to avoid war, but if we must we must. Better make the first strike rather than the second strike with nukes.
When he received that question first off on Saturday’s debate he said he would aid the dissidents against Iran’s current regime. That was a very good answer.
I liked Pat Buchanan when he ran years ago.
Buchanan preparing to endorse Obama?
Could be worse, Pat. We could have a CIC like Ron Paul who says the answer to the Iranian nuclear problem is to “try to be friends with them”. Now that’s some real statesmanship.
We have weapons of mass destruction! Screw with us or any of our allies and you will find how just how destructive they are!!end of statement!
Which war has Obama ended?
He added: Yemen, Pakistan and Libya.
-Daily Predator strikes.
-GITMO, it’s still there.
-Renditions too.
-Leon Panetta says water boarding works.
Gee.........
Once they nuke us—will we be allowed to shoot back??
Does that mean “War Party?”
To understand this concept, one has to read Orwell’s 1984. In that book, they were always at war and winning too! Only problem was that the war never ended.