Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOJ: Lying on Match.com needs to be a crime
cnet ^ | 14 Nov 2011 | Declan McCullagh

Posted on 11/15/2011 1:45:14 PM PST by FourPeas

The U.S. Department of Justice is defending computer hacking laws that make it a crime to use a fake name on Facebook or lie about your weight in an online dating profile at a site like Match.com.

In a statement obtained by CNET that's scheduled to be delivered tomorrow, the Justice Department argues that it must be able to prosecute violations of Web sites' often-ignored, always-unintelligible "terms of service" policies.

The law must allow "prosecutions based upon a violation of terms of service or similar contractual agreement with an employer or provider," Richard Downing, the Justice Department's deputy computer crime chief, will tell the U.S. Congress tomorrow.

Scaling back that law "would make it difficult or impossible to deter and address serious insider threats through prosecution," and jeopardize prosecutions involving identity theft, misuse of government databases, and privacy invasions, according to Downing.

The law in question, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, has been used by the Justice Department to prosecute a woman, Lori Drew, who used a fake MySpace account to verbally attack a 13-year old girl who then committed suicide. Because MySpace's terms of service prohibit impersonation, Drew was convicted of violating the CFAA. Her conviction was later thrown out.

What makes this possible is a section of the CFAA that was never intended to be used that way: a general-purpose prohibition on any computer-based act that "exceeds authorized access." To the Justice Department, this means that a Web site's terms of service define what's "authorized" or not, and ignoring them can turn you into a felon.

On the other hand, because millions of Americans likely violate terms of service

(Excerpt) Read more at news.cnet.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: democrats; doj; dojisajoke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 11/15/2011 1:45:15 PM PST by FourPeas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FourPeas

You mean in the same manner that giving fully automatic weapons to Mexican Drug Cartels is?


2 posted on 11/15/2011 1:47:02 PM PST by Howie66 (I can see November (2012) from my house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas

People lying to impress the other sex is going to be a CRIME?


3 posted on 11/15/2011 1:48:58 PM PST by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas

Does that mean my daughter’s cat has to take down its Facebook page?


4 posted on 11/15/2011 1:49:45 PM PST by Maceman (Obama: As American as nasei goreng)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas

The Just Us Dept. can’t be bothered to enforce (or follow) Constitutional matters, but can Facebutt terms of service?

nice.


5 posted on 11/15/2011 1:50:14 PM PST by WOBBLY BOB (See ya later, debt inflator ! Gone in 4 (2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howie66
no no, like sneaking into America, assuming someones identity, stealing tax money via undeserved services

also, kinda like using 12 SS #'s and being ineligible to be president but,,,

6 posted on 11/15/2011 1:50:22 PM PST by NativeSon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas
In a way, if a person is wasting time with another based on false information, I guess you could consider that fraud....though more civil than criminal.

However, me thinks the DOJ has more important things to tend to at the moment.

7 posted on 11/15/2011 1:51:09 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas
DOJ: Lying on Match.com needs to be a crime

However,voter intimidation is still a protected right


8 posted on 11/15/2011 1:51:28 PM PST by massmike (Massachusetts:Stopped hanging witches;started electing Kennedys.Coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas

9 posted on 11/15/2011 1:51:40 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

hopefully you haven’t removed any mattress tags .


10 posted on 11/15/2011 1:52:36 PM PST by WOBBLY BOB (See ya later, debt inflator ! Gone in 4 (2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

never give your real name on the internet and trust no one ,but trust me my name is molson209 LOL


11 posted on 11/15/2011 1:52:36 PM PST by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: molson209

Pssst, I’m really an FSU Grad from Houston.


12 posted on 11/15/2011 1:54:16 PM PST by dfwgator (I stand with Herman Cain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas
Match.com used pictures of models and false profiles to sucker gullible men to sign up to try and date them. I found the same picture and slightly altered profile in Burnsville, Ms, Vernon, Alabama, Alton, Oklahoma, and in Orange County, California. When confronted all four profiles disappeared from Match.com. I saved her picture from the site. This was about four years ago and I haven't given Match.com a look since.
13 posted on 11/15/2011 1:55:04 PM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron
“However, me thinks the DOJ has more important things to tend to at the moment.”

This is their entry into regulating content on the internet.
Think of all the, “lies” here on FR which will need their attention. Slippery slope ahead!

14 posted on 11/15/2011 1:55:25 PM PST by outofsalt ("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas

So, the people who think it is NO bodies business what their posting history is, and WANT to keep their personal stuff, personal, can’t have a “alias” name?

They want to be able to know who you are, what you think, and no place to hide, because you know, keeping the plebs in line is just so much more important than actually enforcing the laws already on the books.

Need to keep all these morons in line while we fleece them clean of everything they own.


15 posted on 11/15/2011 1:55:50 PM PST by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publicae scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB; outofsalt

Agreed, that’s why I was thinking civil vs criminal.


16 posted on 11/15/2011 1:58:35 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Does it mean I have to give my actual weight for my driver’s license? I didn’t do that at 16... I sure as heck am NOT doing it now!


17 posted on 11/15/2011 2:00:09 PM PST by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Dude, someones pissed off that when their date showed up they were not as good looking as they were when they saw them online. (laugh)


18 posted on 11/15/2011 2:00:23 PM PST by thesaleboat (Pray The Rosary Daily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas
Just posted this on another thread. It's amazing how many threads it could be posted on:

I think the feds want to get involved in literally everything just so the sheeple will continue to consider them relevant.

19 posted on 11/15/2011 2:00:25 PM PST by JennysCool (My hypocrisy goes only so far)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas
What makes this possible is a section of the CFAA that was never intended to be used that way: a general-purpose prohibition on any computer-based act that "exceeds authorized access." To the Justice Department, this means that a Web site's terms of service define what's "authorized" or not, and ignoring them can turn you into a felon.

So any liberal trolls on Free Republic can be imprisoned. Same thing for Romney trolls.

20 posted on 11/15/2011 2:00:51 PM PST by gitmo (Hatred of those who think differently is the left's unifying principle.-Ralph Peters NY Post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson