Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Could End Rush Limbaugh's Career?
Townhall.com ^ | 11/17/2011 | Michael Brown

Posted on 11/17/2011 10:04:23 AM PST by servo1969

It was surprising to hear Rush Limbaugh say the words, “I don’t have the guts to bring it up,” but he did, on November 8th, to his massive radio audience.

Rush Limbaugh lacking the guts to address something publicly? Rush Limbaugh not willing to tackle controversy? Really?

He was responding to a statement by a caller named Lawrence as they discussed Joe Paterno and the scandal at Penn State.

CALLER: “What’s that?”

RUSH: “Nobody has the guts to actually give the explanation for what was going on and why there was trepidation in reporting it, and that's all I'll say. If you can figure it out on your own, fine and dandy. . . .”

What was Rush talking about?

Let’s put this in context. If there is any prominent figure in America who does not bow down to political correctness or media pressure, it is Rush Limbaugh. In fact, he’s on record as saying that when people try to silence you, you should shout louder.

-snip-

What is it that, in his words, could end his career? What is it about the Penn State scandal that is “glaring; it's right in front of everybody,” and yet “Nobody has the guts to actually give the explanation for what was going on and why there was trepidation in reporting it”?

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: career; end; limbaugh; rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161 next last
To: Erik Latranyi

Uh, you realize that the age of consent in many parts of the US was 14 until the 1920s. It is at 16 in several states. “18” is rather arbitrary.


101 posted on 11/17/2011 4:40:01 PM PST by Clemenza ("History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil governm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

I fully understand what you are saying, and yes, we do disagree. It’s a polite and nuanced disagreement, but definitely a disagreement.


102 posted on 11/17/2011 4:44:21 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
I understand full well what they do, how they hold an audience and why 90% what they spew is entertainment and does not pass for serious discourse on policy issues. When the battle over the repeal of DADT took place other than occasional perfunctory comments about the military not to be used for social experimentation both Rush and Hannity were UA. No Elaine Donnelly, no comments on false polling data out of the DoD. Not one mention on the policy ramifications, costs or moral implications of the repeal. Rush did not even provide a passing comment. I listen to them every day thinking they would pick up on what was really about to happen. I was wrong just silence. They are entertainers and the entertainment industry is pro-gay. Their silence spoke volumes. I expected to read that Rush was bored with it all needed new challenges and was thinking of retiring. Reading that his Achilles heal was the gay issue was old news. Rush avoids real discussions on gay issues like it was cancer. I no longer listen to Hannity, Rush and myriad of others “conservative” talkers because I discovered that even navel gazing would be a far better use of my time that listening to them. If I want to kill brain cells scotch goes down far better than hearing you're a “great American” 10 times in 10 minutes. I am not some single issue idiot but this issue is personal as is the attack on military retirees, veterans and servicemen, another issue given lip service. Do not get me wrong listening to any liberal talking head makes finger nails on a chalk board sound like Mozart.
103 posted on 11/17/2011 4:46:52 PM PST by OldGoatCPO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: OldGoatCPO

Given all Rush does to support the military, you are simply insisting on being unhappy with them.

Go ahead and enjoy your self righteous misery. Free country.


104 posted on 11/17/2011 5:31:19 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
Uh, you realize that the age of consent in many parts of the US was 14 until the 1920s.

Uh, you realize that only covered heterosexual relations?

105 posted on 11/18/2011 4:34:30 AM PST by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Rush may not want to say it- but by saying what he has, he may have gotten it out anyway (Rush is not stupid this way)

I am betting there was an entire ‘ring’ of people involved in pedophiles with the penn state issue


106 posted on 11/18/2011 7:04:41 AM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to proofreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

You make a good point - Rush cannot POSSIBLY say anything on the air that he does not have 100% absolute proof of.

If he state a ‘rumor’ on-air, he would be finished.

But he can get the rumor mill cranked up and let people help investigate it on their own, if there is any basis in truth. And Ihope people do, if there is.

My bet: (NOTE THIS IS ALL SPECULATION - I HAVE NO INFO - ONLY SUSPICIONS) Homosexual pedophile ring, involving many high level people of the NAMBLA type. If this was only Sandusky, he could not have gotten away with it so long. And if true I would put good money that a lot of democraps are in it. Republicans would be exposed and jailed.


107 posted on 11/18/2011 7:10:36 AM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to proofreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: davisfh

One I share. Particularly if you listen to what he says after that statement. Of course, it fits with my own particular prejudices/opinions about sports in educational institutions.


108 posted on 11/18/2011 7:11:47 AM PST by Roses0508
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
"I think Rush doesn't want to say, or is afraid to say, is that there may be more then just one sick deviant involved in this......

Who else knew, when did they know, what did they know, and was anyone else involved ?"

I have no proof, just a gut level feeling, but I'll bet that this situation extends to many other colleges, beyond Penn State.

109 posted on 11/18/2011 7:18:24 AM PST by matthew fuller ((1) fully fund defense, (2) transform entitlement programs, and (3) do not raise taxes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

I think his occasional references to an “stealth government” running the country may enter into this discussion.


110 posted on 11/18/2011 7:22:49 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
I have not followed this story so I may be totally off...but every time I see the headlines about this controversy linked to the children's charity I think about the scandal several years ago in I think Portugal where the politicians were using the children in the state orphanages for their sexual play things and party favors.

I think there just might be a whole lot more, maybe a much wider scope to this story that if Americans ever learned combined with the homosexual predator angle would have them picking up pitchforks and taking things into their own hands. That type of thing caused a stir in Europe but here???

Like I said ....conjecture...

111 posted on 11/18/2011 7:25:31 AM PST by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DLfromthedesert

“Lollipop.....LOL”

When I quickly read that post I saw “lollipoop”. Now I see that I misread it.


112 posted on 11/18/2011 7:31:45 AM PST by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Yes. You’re right ever since the homosexual activists came out of the audience while he was subbing on the Pat Sajak Show in 1990. Gave $10,000 to a Pediatric AIDS Foundation and apologized.

Also the guy who got him his big break in Sacramento was also gay.


113 posted on 11/18/2011 7:35:36 AM PST by bjorn14 (Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

bump to view at home...


114 posted on 11/18/2011 7:43:28 AM PST by pgkdan ("Make what Americans buy, Buy what Americans make, and sell it to the world" Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: matthew fuller
I have no proof, just a gut level feeling, but I'll bet that this situation extends to many other colleges, beyond Penn State.

I wouldn't be the least bit surprised, that said, Sandusky, was the architect of Linebacker U, and retired at the young age of 55, and never ever got another job offer from another college or even an offer to coach LBs in the NFL....nothing.

So, I'm not totally buying into this "we were all fooled" stuff. Also, nothing, and absolutely nothing I have read, suggests that Sandusky was a loner with no friends, who kept to himself.....

115 posted on 11/18/2011 7:53:37 AM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I also suspect that the Second Mile operation was one of many “feeder” operations supplying children to wealthy molesters, and that this network is widespread. I also believe that this network is “bait” to draw in support for a particular agenda, with the bargain being “help support our agenda and plans, and you can do ANYTHING you want, fulfill ANY fantasy you have.”


116 posted on 11/18/2011 7:55:51 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
LOL--" buggering little boys is a homosexual act"--and molesting little girls is of course a heterosexual act. Men all know they they like them young, whether they're gay or straight. Mature men, virtuous men know that some desires are off limits and control their impulses or learn to have a healthy disgust for such impulses.

Yesterday on the Martha Stewart show she played a commercial where she was a model at age fifteen. Part of the commercial involved her being embraced by a man in his thirties, as she was playing his "wife." I was disgusted--but that was they way things were in the sixties when MS was a model.

It is interesting that we've gotten to a place that there are so many kinds of sex. Sex between a man and a child is another kind of sex, distinct from either homosexual or heterosexual sex.

117 posted on 11/18/2011 8:03:58 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

You want Limbaugh to start spouting off about pop culture garbage? As far as I’m concerned he should double down on ignoring that nonsense.


118 posted on 11/18/2011 8:08:25 AM PST by Blackyce (President Jacques Chirac: "As far as I'm concerned, war always means failure.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Personally, I have wondered whether there is also a RACIAL aspect to this? I haven't seen much about the boys involved, but... they supposedly came from "under-privileged" homes... It COULD be, that they were all black.

But... the homosexual aspect is more likely what Rush was referring to.

119 posted on 11/18/2011 8:08:46 AM PST by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matthew fuller
"I have no proof, just a gut level feeling, but I'll bet that this situation extends to many other colleges, beyond Penn State."

Boy, that didn't take long until it became "fact". It was just reported on Fox News that there is another scandal, at Syracuse University.

120 posted on 11/18/2011 8:10:27 AM PST by matthew fuller ((1) fully fund defense, (2) transform entitlement programs, and (3) do not raise taxes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson