“OK, Newt defenders, defend this Romney-grade flip flopping and situational ethics.”
Let me start by saying that you not only changed the quote to suit your purpose, but only an intentional liar and bum would do it this way. You wouldn’t know what ethics were if they bit you on the ass.
YOU wrote that Newt said ““Every American should be interested in expanding housing opportunities.”
That Looks like a complete sentence. First word capitalized, period at the end. It was meant to though, wasn’t it Skippy?
Here’s the quote;
“Well, first of all, if you can do it in a way that is financially sound, every American should be interested in expanding housing opportunities for people whether they’re African American, or Latino or of any background so the idea that you’re thinking about how can we help people learn how to budget, how can we help people learn how to save, how could you help them learn how to maintain a house on a low income would strike me, for more people, would be good things to do, not bad things to do and I’m happy to say I made public speeches to the National Association of Home Builders.”
Why the cheating, lying, low down rotten change in what he said? And what’s wrong with what he REALLY said?
There’s your answer, Skippy. Newt supporter or not, let’s not play with the truth like that, OK?
You are just so blinded by Newt's alleged brilliance that you overlook the stench of the Beltway opportunism around him. Some of us are still conservative enough to have a problem with that. You apparently are not.
Oh, and maybe you could try providing a link?
You owe me an apology, sis. I cut and pasted FROM THE ARTICLE. If you take issue with the article, POST A LINK so we all can compare.
The Newt-haters are ridiculous.