What is hyperbole to one is truth to another ...I have a good memory - I know what Romney’s position was on the various issues before he changed his position. I know the actions he took over the years. Changing one’s position on an issue if fine - but acting like he didn’t do it is the problem. Gingrich on the other hand (in most cases - makes it clean he has changed his political position on a issue. Which is a more believable action. I want politicians to show that they have learned from their mistakes and admit it.
Truth is truth, not someone’s version of it. My argument was at those who jump all for Bachmann’s new “No Amnesty” view changing what she said then to fit her new narrative when Newt made his inescapably clear.
Do you find an argument with the three points I made on how to correct the entire issue?