[LRVision]

“it’s not altogether clear that Gingrich is that far to the right of Romney. ‘

Ridiculous assertion. There is no question that Gingrich is and would govern as a conservative, whereas Romney is merely an opportunist with no real convictions.

This article is a pathetic attempt to push Romney. Jonah Goldber should be asamed of himself.

[BillyBoy]

>> There is no question that Gingrich is and would govern as a conservative <<

I question that. Newt may have once been a Reagan Republican and rising GOP star in the '80's, but today's Newt has been bought and paid for, and has been hanging out with liberals and promoting their garbage for at least a decade.

>> Romney is merely an opportunist with no real convictions <<

So is Newt. I say this as someone who met Newt face-to-face and shook his hand four years ago when he had a tent set up and was hawking his books. Newt was only interested in getting $$$ from gullible conservatives and forced everyone to pay for a quick photo-op and wouldn't allow anyone to shake his hand unless you signed for his "American Solutions" newsletter. It was a grassroots event, not a fundraiser, and he was a non-candidate and retired politician at the time. Every other big-name politician that day was more than happy to meet voters for free and get to know their concerns. Not Newt.

[Antoninus]

This article is a pathetic attempt to push Romney. Jonah Goldber should be asamed of himself.

Absolutely correct. National Review is part of the problem. They are lackeys for the GOP establishment liberals.

[CowboyJay]

"There is no question that Gingrich is and would govern as a conservative"

Gingrich has either publicly supported or while in office voted for amnesty, healthcare mandates, global warming legislation, the establishment of the Federal Dept of Education, gun control, and subjugating US sovereignty to supranational bureaucracies

. He is and has always been a progressive in drag. If it's down to Gingrich, Romney, or Obama, I vote NOTA.