http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2813112/posts
If so, the language is in posts 12 and 21. In part the language says:
(b) Applicability to United States Citizens and Lawful Resident Aliens-
(1) UNITED STATES CITIZENS- The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States.
(2) LAWFUL RESIDENT ALIENS- The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to a lawful resident alien of the United States on the basis of conduct taking place within the United States, except to the extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States.
The language used applying to U.S. citizens and legal resident aliens is only referring to SEC. 1032. REQUIREMENT FOR MILITARY CUSTODY.
Nothing is stated exempting U.S. citizens from detainment in SEC. 1031. AFFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES TO DETAIN COVERED PERSONS PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE
In addition the language used for U.S. citizens and legal resident aliens under SEC. 1032 says: “...THE REQUIREMENT TO DETAIN...” Meaning they may if they choose to, just not required.
Where is the clear language that U.S. citizens are exempt from being policed by the U.S. Military?