2. They called each other, according to one account, over 60 times in a 4-month period. For those of you who can’t do the math, that’s once every other day - for months on end. That’s a pretty odd “friendship” with a woman that your wife knows nothing about, isn’t it? Oh - and at least one of those calls was at a strange hour to be calling a “friend” of the opposite sex - 4:30AM. The fact that his wife did not know he was talking on the phone in the middle of the night with a female “friend” raises more red flags.
3. Cain said something about wanting to help the woman out financially. Once again, here is a man who has a 13-year relationship with a woman that his wife knows nothing about, and to whom he is (or is apparently seeking to) giving money to. Red flags all around, folks. But that also works against Cain’s credibility, for if the woman was indeed emotionally unstable, what the heck was he doing having a 13-year relationship with her, calling her in the middle of the night, and admitting that he wanted to help her out financially? Sheer altruism, i.e., out of the goodness of his heart?”
All you Male Cain supporters out there. Have your wife read the above posted by tjd1454. Then ask her if this were you instead of Cain, what would she say to you about it?
“It’s ok honey, I trust you”. “I know you two are just “friends”. “How sweet of you to give her our money”. “How nice of you to console her over the phone late at night”. “I don’t mind that you had a SECRET, FEMALE, friend for over thirteen years, how nice”. “Is she free for church and dinner this Sunday? I’d love to meet her”.
I’m sure your wife’s comment is in there somewhere, right?
Thanks for pointing out what should be obvious to everyone on this thread. For bringing it up I have been accused of being a closet Perry or Newt supporter, which is totally false, not to mention a cheap shot by those who do not wish to deal with the fundamental issue of whether we as Freepers will give blind, unquestioning allegiance to "our guy" and stick our heads in the sand.
I am NOT assuming that the allegations are true. I sincerely hope they are not. However, we need to sort though it all and wait to see what other evidence emerges which will hopefully vindicate him.
My friend, the only problem with your analysis, is that you don’t have the facts. What you say may or may not be plausible, but it’s only conjecture. On that basis, there can be a myriad of explanations.