Posted on 12/01/2011 6:52:37 AM PST by sevinufnine
Honestly, you can't make this stuff up.
Not only did Ginger White lose a libel case this year, according to a former friend and business partner, Ms. White is a lesbian.
And, on top of all of that, Kimberly Vay, who had a relationship with Ms. White, stated that Herman Cain was "never mentioned" during the years they spent as partners.
(Excerpt) Read more at punditpress.com ...
And the sentence that has confused people is this:
The female bodybuilder who once ran a bicycle business with latest Herman Cain accuser Ginger White says the Atlanta woman never mentioned the Republican presidential candidate, who she says was her lover for 13 years.
Some people mis-read the poorly constructed sentence to say that the bodybuilder and Ginger White were lovers. If the writer had written: "Who Ginger White says was her lover for 13 years" then it would have been clear that Ginger White was talking about Cain being her lover for 13 years.
It's not a story. It's not true. No lesbian breaking news. Sorry everyone.
You are among those who think a person should be put in a box and react to a situation in a certain way. Perhaps you need to rethink your litmus test. Put yourself in his shoes and see how you would react. You’ve had time to reflect on the charges and come up with what you think is a suitable way to handle these. Cain was caught off guard. I’m so sick of holier-than-thou people.
You are among those who think a person should be put in a box and react to a situation in a certain way. Perhaps you need to rethink your litmus test. Put yourself in his shoes and see how you would react. You’ve had time to reflect on the charges and come up with what you think is a suitable way to handle these. Cain was caught off guard. I’m so sick of holier-than-thou people.
Let me be the first to say, Good catch! :)
Ha! Why, thank you Sir. :-)
That's ok, we're all entitled to our own opinions of Cain's explanations. I liked Cain, a lot, but I find his reaction to the accusations very unconvincing. This is just my honest gut reaction.
And since FR is not a court of law, and we are not sworn jurors, we do not have to wait for a "proof" before we're allowed to form an opinion.
I for one do not want to see yet another unfaithful man in the White House. That doesn't make me "holier-than-thou," it just means I take traditional morals seriously, and don't like to see our leaders make a mockery of marriage.
For this reason I am skeptical of Gingrich too. My preferred candidate is Rick Santorum, but sadly it doesn't look like he will be the nominee.
I merely pointed out that reacting with anger in something like this is not anywhere close to a universal response and that therefore the basis of your reaction is purely emotional subjectivism.
I think you are entitled to your opinion anyway though.
Opinions, as they say - are like butt holes - everyone has one. I want proof before I make a decision about Mr. Cain’s unfaithfulness - if true. I have no clue if its true or not - people are basing their misguided opinions on accusations of women who have shady pasts. Sorry, I’m not buying this. However, if one Ms. Ginger White can prove something - then ok, I will then reassess my opinion. Until then - a person is innocent until proven guilty.
It sure is convenient that he gave her cash.There isn’t any paper trail to prove her allegations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.