[nathanbedford]

Look, I do care that you disagree with me I object to your snarky tone. It doesn't advance the discussion and it doesn't become you.

You started off by saying:

"ROFLOL! "

And not satisfied with that, after you were referred to polls, you repeated,"ROFLOL! " without any effort or decency on your part to set forth your position. If you had a legitimate difference about the meaning of the word you could've pointed it out but you didn't do that you reverted to snarkiness one more time. Now you want to be heard self righteously complaining about an attack?

Finally, you compound your snarkiness in your last reply and reveal yourself to be a hypocrite by even more childish name-calling: "jerk!."

If you want to take issue with what I say do so like a humanoid, if you cannot act like a conservative, and you will be respectfully treated.

Come on like a sophomore or an offensive drunk and you will be rebuked.

[lonestar]

Huntsman has a Dewey problem-people just don't like him.

Reading that, what would you think it meant?...knowing that people didn't like Dewey...er, ah...people weren't fond of Dewey?

You started the trash talk. I said "ROFLOL" because I was LOL at the thought of people "liking" Newt or Mitt.

I plead guilty in that I thought you knew what you were talking about when you used the word "like."

Now you accuse me of being "snarky" while calling me sophmoric or drunk!

IOW, you need a vocabulary adjustment to express yourself more clearly... and it's my fault!

You're a piece of work!