1 posted on
12/06/2011 12:44:53 PM PST by
SmithL
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: SmithL
Does it also say that the IRS later cleared him?
2 posted on
12/06/2011 12:47:30 PM PST by
Not A Snowbird
(Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface)
To: SmithL
Unless I missed it, they seem to conveniently forget the part where the charges were deemed bogus.
3 posted on
12/06/2011 12:47:44 PM PST by
RockinRight
(If you're waiting to drink until you find pure water, you're going to die of dehydration.)
To: SmithL
What does you ethics report look like stretch, you belong in jail.
4 posted on
12/06/2011 12:48:03 PM PST by
boomop1
(term limits is the only way to save this country.)
To: SmithL
No response needed, the RNC will take care of this!
5 posted on
12/06/2011 12:48:04 PM PST by
GoCards
(I am a Hobbit)
To: SmithL
OK, it’s popcorn time - again!
Nancy, you ignorant slut. :)
6 posted on
12/06/2011 12:48:40 PM PST by
RexBeach
To: SmithL
Lurkers! I was being sarcastic. :)
7 posted on
12/06/2011 12:49:10 PM PST by
GoCards
(I am a Hobbit)
To: SmithL
Too bad it’s so long, but then again it took lots of political contortions to reach their “conclusion”. It reads like documentation of a completely partisan witch hunt. At no point does it appear that Newt did anything approaching the behavior of the then Clintoon administration and certainly nothing akin to what this Administration is currently doing.
10 posted on
12/06/2011 12:50:42 PM PST by
Steamburg
(The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
To: SmithL
This just smacks a Monty Python skid ....
11 posted on
12/06/2011 12:51:13 PM PST by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: SmithL
Can somebody remind me again when Maxine Waters' ethics trial is scheduled?
-PJ
13 posted on
12/06/2011 12:53:44 PM PST by
Political Junkie Too
(If you can vote for President, then your children can run for President.)
To: SmithL
“Gingrich used tax exempt contributions for political purposes and then attempted to mislead the Ethics Committee about it.”
Newt needs to publish the IRS ruling that stated his use of tax exempt contributions was a textbook example of how the law was intended to be used.
14 posted on
12/06/2011 12:54:07 PM PST by
G Larry
("I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his Character.")
To: SmithL
claiming Pelosi was threatening to disclose non-public information Newt "claimed" that because that's exactly what Pelosi threatened to do.
Leave it this Dem mouthpiece rag to be the only outlet pretending to believe Pelosi's later backtracking.
How exactly would Pelosi "threaten to release" information that's already public?
15 posted on
12/06/2011 12:54:47 PM PST by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: SmithL
Like I said yesterday on another thread, Pelosi Galore is going to release old information as "new", and the Democrat-Media Complex is going to go right along with her scheme.
The only problem is that she jumped the gun. She was supposed to wait until after Newt got the nomination to do this.
To: SmithL
Considering the speed with with Nanny Pelosi fled from her first statement, I’d say that she took Newt at his word. SFGate is just shoveling a bunch of manure on top to hide the wreckage.
17 posted on
12/06/2011 12:58:17 PM PST by
Tallguy
To: SmithL
Gingrich should surrender his principles and do a global warming commercial with a prominent Democrat so that liberals will like him. Oh wait... never mind.
20 posted on
12/06/2011 1:00:24 PM PST by
ArcadeQuarters
(Stuck with a local RINO? Regardless of who you vote for, donate $$$ to a different district.)
To: SmithL
Gingrich should use scorched earth tactics against Pelosi. Everytime she opens her pie hole Gingrich should bring up the loan guarantees for Pelosi’s brother in law, the 0bamacare waivers for her favorite restaraunt etc. Screw the marquis of queensbury rules. Punch her in the mouth with brass knuckles.
To: SmithL
Gingrich said that would be foul play and promised to retaliate, claiming Pelosi was threatening to disclose non-public information.
Why would anyhing about a public servant, 'ceptin his SSN, be non-public information?
23 posted on
12/06/2011 1:15:29 PM PST by
thegreatbeast
(The evil which you fear becomes a certainty by what you do.)
To: SmithL
Actually none of this stuff should be hidden from the public, Pelosi and her cronies included.
25 posted on
12/06/2011 1:17:36 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
To: SmithL
Bwahahahahahahahaha! THEY DID IT AGAIN!
These ink-stained wretches simply CANNOT write ANYTHING about New Gingrich without using the word “baggage”.
26 posted on
12/06/2011 1:26:45 PM PST by
Walrus
(Big media is the natural enemy of liberty)
To: SmithL
Newt is not my candidate but I know he is a good man.
28 posted on
12/06/2011 1:28:30 PM PST by
Saundra Duffy
( For victory & freedom!!!)
To: SmithL
Ethics & Congress?
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
29 posted on
12/06/2011 1:47:30 PM PST by
DeaconRed
(I am VERY disgusted with the field we have to choose from. Another hold my nose general election.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson