Pay close attention. Newt Gingrich wants to replace Obamacare with Gingrichcare.
1 posted on
12/09/2011 7:10:33 PM PST by
Hoodat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: Hoodat
Oh vomit... The other 90% is RomneyCare.
2 posted on
12/09/2011 7:16:44 PM PST by
rwilson99
(Please tell me how the words "shall not perish and have everlasting life" would NOT apply to Mary.)
To: Hoodat
Yeah, I support Gingrich but I don’t like this idea. We don’t need national healthcare...no matter how benign it will eventually be perverted into British style government driven bureaucracy. We need to convince Newt to leave healthcare to the open market. If I had my way I would outlaw health insurance and force doctors and hospitals to accept what people could afford to pay.
3 posted on
12/09/2011 7:17:55 PM PST by
ez
("Abashed the Devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton, "Paradise Lost")
To: Hoodat
Don’t leave us in suspense NOOT!
Which 300 pages isn’t crap?
Is it the part about requiring indiviudals to purchase healthcare?
Is it Death Panels?
What is it?
Like normal, Gingrich wants a big government solution to Healthcare that he thinks he will be able to make work. Good luck trying to convince him otherwise, because, he is after all, the smartest guy in the room.
4 posted on
12/09/2011 7:22:29 PM PST by
parksstp
(Articulate Conservatives look for Converts. RINO's look for Democrat Heretics.)
To: Hoodat
7 posted on
12/09/2011 7:23:42 PM PST by
MichaelCorleone
(Stop feeding the beast; if they don't say "Merry Christmas", don't buy.)
To: Hoodat
And the EPA with the ESA.
11 posted on
12/09/2011 7:26:16 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
To: Hoodat
Depends on what we are talking about. If it involves the free market I am all for it. It is to easy to pile on when all the facts are not known.
To: Hoodat
Love Newt's Healthcare Solutions. With these Patient Power reforms, healthcare can be transformed from an anchor on our economy to an engine. From a broken, fragmented system to a coordinated, innovative system that delivers more choices at lower cost for all Americans. This comprehensive approachcost, quality, competition, and coveragecan solve the problem of the uninsured with no individual mandate and no employer mandate. Everyone would be able to obtain essential health care and coverage when needed. For those who are too poor to buy health insurance, states will have more flexibility to provide them with the assistance they need to buy it. For those who nevertheless choose not to purchase coverage and then become too sick to do so, high risk pools will provide access to coverage. Once you have health insurance, you are assured you can keep it. By contrast, even Obamacare for all its trillions in taxes, spending, new entitlements, and new bureaucracy still does not achieve universal coverage http://www.newt.org/solutions/healthcare
16 posted on
12/09/2011 7:31:15 PM PST by
katiedidit1
("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
To: Hoodat
There is absolutely nothing good in ObamaCare. Newt is an unprincipled gadfly.
23 posted on
12/09/2011 7:36:19 PM PST by
steelyourfaith
(If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
To: Hoodat
And you want to replace it with hoodatcare. Me, I prefer solsoncare.
25 posted on
12/09/2011 7:46:29 PM PST by
Solson
(The Voters stole the election! And the establishment wants it back.)
To: Hoodat
The bottom line is that none of these candidates are worthy of your vote.
To: Hoodat
35 posted on
12/09/2011 8:05:01 PM PST by
BunnySlippers
(I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: Hoodat
” - - - but would reinstate “a little over 10 percent” of it.”
Good ol’ Nanny-State Newt. He never met a Federal Safety Net he didn’t like.
Sorry Newt, we cannot afford you, as we are TAXED ENOUGH ALREADY.
54 posted on
12/09/2011 9:02:40 PM PST by
Graewoulf
(( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))
To: Hoodat
It’s like saying “Well, at least Mussolini made the trains run on time”.
But first, we need to overthrow Obamalini. Then we can deal with the trains.
57 posted on
12/09/2011 9:10:20 PM PST by
rfp1234
(RFP's Law: Whoever blames Bush first shall lose the argument.)
To: Hoodat
2700-300= 2400 pages
And so as we WAIT and WAIT and WAIT and WAIT ...for so called repeal, with 2400 pages of.....
.... then has “Mr. Contract”, while we WAIT AND WAIT AND WAIT, signed a CONTRACT to promise by order of the so called Health Secretary, to EXEMPT all the people as his first act, along with all the other exemptions, based on non-discrimination?
58 posted on
12/09/2011 9:20:24 PM PST by
Varsity Flight
(Phony-Care is the Government Work-Camp)
To: Hoodat
Can’t we do better than Newt Gingrich??? He wont please us conservatives any more than bush did!! Probably less!!
/whine
69 posted on
12/09/2011 10:26:02 PM PST by
Yaelle
(Excuse the mobile device errors please.)
To: sickoflibs
about 300 pages that are pretty good, a little over 10 percent, but they should be part of the replace document," Gingrich said. for yer amusement...ole noot knows theres *something* big gov can do to help us...
is this the evolution of the point shaving ???
73 posted on
12/09/2011 10:58:46 PM PST by
Gilbo_3
(Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
To: Hoodat
74 posted on
12/09/2011 11:24:31 PM PST by
Rick_Michael
( 'REAL' Conservatives who witch hunt their own, are no better than Obama.)
To: Hoodat
This is no surprise... Newt’s support for forcing people to purchase health insurance is well known. Course, knowing the mood on FR lately this has now retroactively probably become a brilliant idea. I can’t wait til 2013 if Newt wins and people start pretending they didn’t vigorously back him. “How do these RINOS get in power? How does the media keep choosing our candidates?”
76 posted on
12/09/2011 11:58:18 PM PST by
COgamer
To: Hoodat; All
This comprehensive approachcost, quality, competition, and coveragecan solve the problem of the uninsured with no individual mandate and no employer mandate. Everyone would be able to obtain essential health care and coverage when needed. For those who are too poor to buy health insurance, states will have more flexibility to provide them with the assistance they need to buy it. For those who nevertheless choose not to purchase coverage and then become too sick to do so, high risk pools will provide access to coverage. Once you have health insurance, you are assured you can keep it. By contrast, even Obamacare for all its trillions in taxes, spending, new entitlements, and new bureaucracy still does not achieve universal coverage. http://www.newt.org/solutions/healthcare
So, as stated, Gingrich's goal is universal coverage.
How is that achievable with no individual mandate and no employer mandate?
Help me out here.
90 posted on
12/10/2011 1:19:24 AM PST by
fightinJAG
(So many seem to have lost their sense of smell . . .)
To: Hoodat
I can’t handle this. Gingrich is to big government for me.
Sorry
92 posted on
12/10/2011 3:02:07 AM PST by
dforest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson