Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rick Perry forgets number of Supreme Court judges (Oops! The MSM flubs it ....again)
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | December 10, 2011 | AP

Posted on 12/10/2011 1:55:37 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: Revolting cat!

That’s Heinz-Kerry justice — 57 flavors (at least Barack is sticking with that story).


41 posted on 12/10/2011 2:36:03 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I watched that video several times and saw absolutely no references to his previous statement about 8 judges on the SCOTUS.........How did I miss it and at what time frame was it mentioned?


42 posted on 12/10/2011 2:36:30 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (Be good, Santa is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland
Good try of damage control by his campaign; but that isn't what he meant after reading the transcript.

You need to read it again - the whole thing this time. It is obviously exactly what he meant.

43 posted on 12/10/2011 2:39:50 PM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Big Deal, Obama thinks there are 57 States.


44 posted on 12/10/2011 2:49:14 PM PST by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

I don’t get it: the original spin was that he meant 1 Chief Justice, 8 Judges. This seems to be a default spin.


45 posted on 12/10/2011 2:51:37 PM PST by miss marmelstein (Still heartless after all these years...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind
Nice bit of spin, but he still got Sotomayor’s name wrong.

When Texas secedes it won't matter anyway

46 posted on 12/10/2011 2:54:39 PM PST by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

A lot of people here don’t seem to get at all what’s really important. This isn’t about whether Rick Perry remembers a name or number perfectly. It’s about who gets to choose the next Supreme Court Justice. This decision will impact this country for years to come. Do you want President Obama to make this decision? Or how about Mitt Romney or the guy who sat on the couch next to Princess Nancy. In recent years, time after time, Republican presidents have put liberal people on the court. I know that Rick Perry would put a conservative there. For me that’s all that counts.


47 posted on 12/10/2011 2:56:11 PM PST by Essie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Just like Herman Cain knows that the ChiComs have nuclear weapons but are trying to “go nuclear” with their aircraft carrier.


48 posted on 12/10/2011 3:01:41 PM PST by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
I don’t get it: the original spin was that he meant 1 Chief Justice, 8 Judges.

Whose spin was that? I never heard it before. I doubt very much that it ever came from Perry. He knew what he meant, as is obvious from the transcript. The only thing he got wrong was the year of the referenced Supreme Court decision - he put it in 1962; actually the case was decided in 1963.

49 posted on 12/10/2011 3:06:28 PM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

How did I miss it and at what time frame was it mentioned?


He is referencing a SCOTUS decision from 1963 but mentions 1962. Go to the 33 minute mark in this video of the full interview and there is one reference. At about 26 minutes in he is speaking of his faith and that goes on for some time.

http://www.c-span.org/Campaign2012/Rick-Perry-Interviewed-by-Iowa-Newspaper/10737426157-1/


50 posted on 12/10/2011 3:08:09 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Perry *is* wrong, there are ONLY 4 Supreme Court Justices.

Well, let me clarify that a bit... OCCASIONALLY, there are 5 supremes.

... oh, and there are 4 (mostly 5) Supreme Court chairs that seem to usually have some vile life form on top of them.

51 posted on 12/10/2011 3:08:44 PM PST by C210N (Dems: "We must tax you so that we can buy our votes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Essie

Essie, I’m with you. You have an excellent grip on what is important and what is not. Keep posting!


52 posted on 12/10/2011 3:11:53 PM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: C210N

Perry’s more radical than I realized:

“It’s one of the reasons I’ve called for doing away with the federal government.”


53 posted on 12/10/2011 3:12:19 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: deport
He is referencing a SCOTUS decision from 1963 but mentions 1962. Go to the 33 minute mark in this video

Perhaps he was in the video YOU are citing but the one that is getting quoted is the one I posted, which certainly does not bode well for his ability to make himself clear when speaking on such topics........

Like I said, he had better start getting his act together or the MSM is going to eat him alive next year.......

54 posted on 12/10/2011 3:19:06 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (Be good, Santa is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Except Perry mentioned a case from 1962. Did he just pull that era out of thin air or did he really have that case in mind when he referenced the eight?

To me it's a non-story. The press played "gotcha" where "gotcha" wasn't appropriate. Perry clearly referenced the case his campaign later specified. This is just an instance of lazy hack "journalism."

55 posted on 12/10/2011 3:23:45 PM PST by newzjunkey (Republicans will find a way to reelect Obama and Speaker Pelosi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Not sure which video you are refercing as the item came from Perry’s interview by the Des Moines Register staff. The eight is at the time frame I pointed you to in the interview.


56 posted on 12/10/2011 3:34:57 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

P.S. I agree with you about his ability to make himself clear, condensed and to topic at times.

See: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2818746/posts?page=21#21


57 posted on 12/10/2011 3:37:40 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; RoosterRedux; jonrick46; deepbluesea; RockinRight; TexMom7; potlatch; ...
Perry Ping....

IF you'd rather NOT be pinged FReepmail me.

IF you'd like to be added FReepmail me. Thanks.

*****************************************************************************************************************************************************


58 posted on 12/10/2011 3:42:47 PM PST by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport
Not sure which video you are refercing as the item came from Perry’s interview

I'm refering to Post#1 and the topic of this thread......click on the link and watch the video.

59 posted on 12/10/2011 3:43:28 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (Be good, Santa is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

[Maybe you need to be tested for Intentional Unwarranted Serious Harshness Syndrome.]

Look, I like Perry, I like his principles and believe his a true Conservative.

What I posted was because of concern for him, if you took it the wrong way, I apologize.


60 posted on 12/10/2011 3:45:32 PM PST by RetSignman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson