Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wolfie
Yep. The SC has already set the precedent in Gonzales v. Raich that ANYTHING affects interstate commerce, even home-cultivation of a plant the trade in which is actually illegal between States. So a federal health insurance mandatte? That’s a slam dunk.

The precedent was Wickard v Filburn. And it was an absolute piece of crap.

14 posted on 12/14/2011 4:09:42 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

Wickard v. Filburn at least involved a product actually traded between the States, although it certainly laid the foundation for Gonzales v. Raich.

But the real point is this: Americans are children, incapable of consistent thought. If we like the law, then we say Congress has the power. If we don’t, they we say Congress doesn’t. Principals? None in sight.


19 posted on 12/14/2011 4:18:19 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson