Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H

47 posted on 12/14/2011 4:54:24 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Yosemitest
So who got it right on the Commerce Clause in your opinion... Scalia or Thomas?
52 posted on 12/14/2011 5:03:57 AM PST by Ken H (Austerity is the irresistible force. Entitlements are the immovable object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest
The Commerce Clause gives the Federal Government the limited power, “To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes;”

Now, the Progressives have contorted the meaning of this power to support everything from National Healthcare (Obamacare), to regulation of monopolies, price-fixing, wage regulation, and many other unconstitutional federal activities.

Other unconstitutional federal activities such as their War On Drugs.

110 posted on 12/14/2011 11:57:16 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest
The only purpose was to give the Federal Government the adequate power to ensure that commerce between the States was not interrupted by tariffs, quotas, or other taxes.

Actually, it was to make sure the States got a share of the taxes from points of entry.

A direct consequence of this power of regulating commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, is that of establishing ports; or such places of entry, lading, and unlading, as may be most convenient for the merchant on the one hand, and for the easy and effectual collection of the revenue from customs, on the other.
St. George Tucker, Blackstone's Commentaries

It was decided by this court in the case of Woodruff v. Parham, 8 Wall. 123, that the term 'imports' as used in that clause of the constitution which declares that 'no state shall, without the consent of congress, lay any imposts or duties on imports or exports,' does not refer to articles carried from one state into another, but only to articles imported from foreign countries into the United States.
Brown vs Houston

It could also be used as a tool for Constitutional compliance by allowing the federal government the ability to sanction States by routing traffic away from points of entry as well, thus denying them 'income'.

125 posted on 12/14/2011 1:47:10 PM PST by MamaTexan (I am ~Person~ as created by the Law of Nature, not a 'person' as created by the law of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson