No, the Commerce Clause is why ALL marijuana is illegal, whether it crosses State lines or not. That’s the point. Under Gonzales v. Raich, even non-interstate commerce can be regulated under the Commerce Clause. And that make the Commerce Clause the bad mofo that it is. It’s a virtual catch-all for anything the Feds want to do.
The "substantial effect doctrine" is not the Commerce Clause.
Once you understand that, you understand the Big Lie.
No, the Commerce Clause is why ALL marijuana is illegal, whether it crosses State lines or not.
Under that understanding of the constitution, the federal government has total control of everything that has a physical presence. That can’t be right.