Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter: NEWT: SPEAK BOMBASTICALLY AND CARRY A TINY STICK (Romney: STUCK)
AnnCoulter.Com ^ | December 14, 2011 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 12/14/2011 2:18:34 PM PST by Syncro

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last
This is not a small-government conservative talking. It is not a conservative at all.


Read the rest at AnnCoulter.Com


1 posted on 12/14/2011 2:18:45 PM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Syncro

so long Ann! we hardly knew you.


2 posted on 12/14/2011 2:21:43 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Newt Gingrich 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Ann Coulter missuses the term Conservative when she calls herself one.

She’s a paid spokesperson for Mitt Romney.


3 posted on 12/14/2011 2:23:00 PM PST by o2bfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

The northeastern tail still trying to wag the American dog. It worked for a long time.


4 posted on 12/14/2011 2:23:30 PM PST by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonDog; jellybean; Rummyfan
After Gingrich had been speaker for a brief two years, the Republican House voted 395-28 to reprimand him and fine him $300,000 for ethics violations.
Which they had no real reason to do.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

The GOP is still kowtowing and giving in to the leftists.

5 posted on 12/14/2011 2:24:28 PM PST by Syncro (Sarah Palin, the unofficial Tea Party candidate for president--Virtual Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree

Yep. She calls Romney a conservative.


6 posted on 12/14/2011 2:25:51 PM PST by sheikdetailfeather ("Kick The Communists Out Of Your Govt. And Don't Accept Their Goodies"-Yuri Bezmenov-KGB Defector)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Ouch..


7 posted on 12/14/2011 2:25:57 PM PST by Track9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Ann Coulter, it seems, has become a pro-gay, pro-Romney, anti-freedom systemite.

Too bad. I always thought she was a believer in a God of salvation through Jesus.


8 posted on 12/14/2011 2:29:51 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Ann Barnhardt in for Ann Coulter, please

If our GOP men lack balls, then step aside for the women

Ann Barnhardt on Romney
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gk8O3EPOtT4


9 posted on 12/14/2011 2:30:09 PM PST by silverleaf (common sense is not so common- voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
The truth about Welfare Reform was that an old FDR era rule required that if you were getting welfare and then submitted a change of address order (or the equivalent), your welfare was to be cut off until a case worker could get out to see you.

The theory then was that when welfare folks move it's probably for better circumstances so they may well no longer qualify.

That's probably still true, plus, as we've had to relearn many times, it may also be part of a welfare scam.

So, just before Welfare Reform was implemented USPS came out with a way to update mailing lists quickly and easily. The program was called MOVE UPDATE.

If a state welfare management team simply ran their address files for welfare recipients through MOVE UPDATE they'd instantly find out how many people should be CUT OFF pending that visit.

I was there when Richmond found that half the welfare recipients in Virginia had an address change order on file.

HALF HALF HALF HALF HALF HALF HALF

Ann is wrong ~ the heart of Welfare Reform was still the old fashioned FDR rule that hadn't been observed in decades. HALF the recipients had moved ~ suggesting fraud.

I would imagine the news was in every State welfare management team's office within the hour.

10 posted on 12/14/2011 2:30:28 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
Amazing the grape drinkers here think all those statements will not be used by obummer in the election. I remember the storm he started about women and ditches and that time of the month and infections. How dumb can one person be.
11 posted on 12/14/2011 2:30:40 PM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and his fellow supporters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

So, Ann, who do you think you are helping? Really?

If your boy, Mitt, is the nominee, what do we get? Really?

The heartland of America is looking for a fight with Obama, a fight about the direction of the country, and you recommend to us John McCain with hair, movable arms, and a religion so wacky and easily targeted that Obama and his team will not even break a sweat beating him like a drum as he refuses to fight fire with fire. No thanks, Ann. No thanks. I used to be impressed with your logic ... no more.


12 posted on 12/14/2011 2:33:10 PM PST by Belteshazzar (We are not justified by our works but by faith - De Jacob et vita beata 2 +Ambrose of Milan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Had no real reason to do. Man he negotiated it down to that. Wait all the info will be leaked.


13 posted on 12/14/2011 2:33:33 PM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and his fellow supporters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Syncro; Ann Coulter

Dear Ann,

The year is now 2011 and the election of 2012 requires a knowledgeable leader who’s not afraid to take it to the Marxist and to make certain the election is a referendum about him and his failed policies, and that knowledgeable leader is Newt Gingrich, not your man, Willard Mitt Romney, who would be a career politician but for his loss to Edward Ted Kennedy, back when your man was pro-abortion, remember?

Sincerely,

onyx


14 posted on 12/14/2011 2:33:39 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC:DONATE MONTHLY! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

And to think I admired this womyn once.

Ann, please be quiet and learn to make cookies.


15 posted on 12/14/2011 2:34:08 PM PST by Old Sarge (RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Good bye, see ya, wouldn’t wanna be ya.


16 posted on 12/14/2011 2:34:20 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
If I'm not mistaken, Gingrich offered to pay $300K to cover the expenses the House Ethics Committee incurred from investigating the one document that was submitted to the committee which contained incorrect information.

He was not "fined" anything, nor what he found to be in violation of any House Ethics Rules or of any crime. Additionally, the IRS investigated his enterprise and found that he had not violated any tax laws either.

Clearly the Establishment/Romney machine is making a desperate attack against Newt in an attempt to prevent him from being nominated.
17 posted on 12/14/2011 2:34:38 PM PST by Sudetenland (Anybody but Obama!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
Go away Ann. You are a blot on the memory of President Ronald Reagan.

Can you say ANYTHING good about the person YOU support? (I mean other than that he presumably doesn't beat his wife.)

ML/NJ

18 posted on 12/14/2011 2:34:58 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

If you want a clue as towhere this attack is coming from, look at the title of her article “Bombastically,” where else have we just recently heard that word? Maybe like from Romney himself? Yesterday in his attack against Newt?


19 posted on 12/14/2011 2:36:47 PM PST by Sudetenland (Anybody but Obama!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

I think the new rule is that we never post her picture.


20 posted on 12/14/2011 2:36:47 PM PST by all the best (`~!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson