Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O‘Reilly Asks Romney if Obama Is ’a Socialist’ & He Says…
TheBlaze.com ^ | Dec. 20, 2011 | Becket Adams

Posted on 12/20/2011 9:00:36 AM PST by broken_arrow1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
If Romney gets the GOP nomination, he is NOT getting my vote. Obama is a full-on Communist, and Romney can't even mutter the watered down label of Socialist? I would rather vote Third Party for Ron Paul...at least you know what you are getting.
1 posted on 12/20/2011 9:00:38 AM PST by broken_arrow1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1
"I would rather vote Third Party for Ron Paul...at least you know what you are getting. "

Yeah, you'd be getting the only conservative in the race.

2 posted on 12/20/2011 9:02:26 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1
I always thought venture capitalists (community organizers with more cash) had more cojones than that. It is the same thing as McCain. "Don't say anything mean about Obama and maybe he'll like you and the moderates will vote for you.

Good grief, that is the same premise as Ron Paul's foreign policy.

3 posted on 12/20/2011 9:04:20 AM PST by newheart (Newt's a loose cannon, but at least he knows who the real target is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1

If Rommney is the nominee(likely), I’m writing in Sarah Palin.


4 posted on 12/20/2011 9:05:15 AM PST by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1

How could republican pull the lever for Romney when he is not willing to call a spade a spade?


5 posted on 12/20/2011 9:05:27 AM PST by TennTuxedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1

How could a republican pull the lever for Romney when he is not willing to call a spade a spade?


6 posted on 12/20/2011 9:05:44 AM PST by TennTuxedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1

I agree about not supporting Romney in either primary or general elections.

However, I could never recommend Paul. He is clearly anti-Israel, and one article last week made a decent case that he is an anti-semite.

Beyond that, at the Huckabee forum Paul simply couldn’t explain how he would go about cutting all those departments. He had no idea, and that meant to me he was just tossing red meat.

Worse, of course, are his foreign policy ideas:

1. He wants Iran to have a nuke (supports his anti-Israeli position.)

2. Not only does he not believe in an active offensive approach to national security, but he also doesn’t believe in an active defense. Paul supports a passive defense, and that is isolationism at its worst.

3. He’s a terrible debater, has confused-looking facial expressions, and he’ll be slaughtered in a debate with Obama.


7 posted on 12/20/2011 9:07:55 AM PST by xzins (Pray for Our Troops Remaining in Afghanistan, now that Iran Can Focus on Injuring Only Them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1
I am so sick of this cr@p. Romney won't call Obama a socialist because ROMNEY himself is a socialist.

If this tool wins the nomination, I am off the reservation and may never come back.
8 posted on 12/20/2011 9:08:20 AM PST by Antoninus (Defeat Romney--Defeat Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1

Romney’s not strong enough to take the helm in the coming storm ...


9 posted on 12/20/2011 9:09:45 AM PST by GOPJ (Better is a dinner of herbs where love is, Than a fatted calf with hatred - Proverbs 15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1
Romney doesn't want to call him a socialist only because he knows that the response will be "that's the pot calling the kettle black".

No Romney, no way. Like it or not, that means Newt.

10 posted on 12/20/2011 9:10:17 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

We only have two candidates who haven’t had their time in the sun yet...Santorum and Huntsman.

Wonder if either will make a move...


11 posted on 12/20/2011 9:11:17 AM PST by JosephMama (Who to choose, who to choose...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1

...and ix-nay on the ussein-Hay.


12 posted on 12/20/2011 9:12:47 AM PST by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1

Is he a socialists? Well, probably, but I am a larger socialist than he. I will do worse than he is doing. So elect me to continue this mess. So says Romnie in his demented socialist mind.


13 posted on 12/20/2011 9:13:22 AM PST by RetiredArmy (The End of Days draws near. In this time, you should be drawing closer to the Lord Jesus Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JosephMama
Santorum and Huntsman.

I have been for Santorum since day 1.

He would be a tremendous president.
14 posted on 12/20/2011 9:14:08 AM PST by Antoninus (Defeat Romney--Defeat Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo

This brings back memories of the McCain campaign. Has to play “nice-nice”. Can’t bring up Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayres, etc. I think we’ll be getting McCain redux if Romney gets the nomination.


15 posted on 12/20/2011 9:15:33 AM PST by murron (Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1; Le Chien Rouge
I would rather vote Third Party ... I'm going to write in ...
I just looooove you guys and your false sense of honor.
You'll be the first ones to b*tch when a four year, lame duck 0bama sucks away the last vestiges of freedom.
But that's okay, you'll still have your precious "principles."
16 posted on 12/20/2011 9:17:30 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1
A man who avoids the truth,
switches sides for political expediency,
favors government mandates
and homo man dates is not to be trusted
with the Presidency.

Not this same Mitt Again!

17 posted on 12/20/2011 9:22:26 AM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (You know, 99.99999965% of the lawyers give all of them a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

“I have been for Santorum since day 1.

“He would be a tremendous president.

Has Rick ever had executive experience?


18 posted on 12/20/2011 9:23:37 AM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (You know, 99.99999965% of the lawyers give all of them a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Before Mr. Cain, Mr. Santorum was my man. Welcome back Rick and kick some butt.


19 posted on 12/20/2011 9:25:28 AM PST by cameraeye (A happy kaffir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1

When all is said and done and my candidate doesn’t get the nomination, I don’t give a rat’s ass who the Republican nominee is, I’m pulling the lever for the guy running against Obama. And anyone who does otherwise is either: a) one of Stalin’s useful idiots, or b) an enemy of this country.


20 posted on 12/20/2011 9:27:17 AM PST by Flightdeck (If you hear me yell "Eject, Eject, Eject!" the last two will be echos...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson