[Cringing Negativism Network]

As far as I can tell, Paul is the only candidate in at least a generation in either party, actually attempting to accurately interpret the Constitution of the United States of America.

For real.

That’s certainly not something I have (ever) seen any liberal care one whit about.

Why don’t more Republicans?

[Tex-Con-Man]

With Paul's Carter-like foreign policy, the jihadi’s would control the flow of oil within a month of him taking office. What do you suppose that would do to our economy?

The guy is a menace and needs to go play with his grandkids and leave the rest of us alone.

[SaxxonWoods]

“As far as I can tell, Paul is the only candidate in at least a generation in either party, actually attempting to accurately interpret the Constitution of the United States of America.”

You just made your case for appointing Paul to the Supreme Court. I have to say that would be interesting.

You are not the arbiter of who can “accurately interpret” the Constitution. The Consittution does not require interpretation by a President. It only requires being upheld as written.

Dr. Paul is right where he needs to be, where he can vote against wasteful spending. His foreign policy is suicidal, and he likes to hint that Bush brought down the Towers.

He is impossible to take seriously.